This Section presents the baseline
conditions of ecological resources within the Study Area (including 500m from
the Project Site boundary, within
the HKSAR boundary), and the findings of the terrestrial ecological assessment associated
with the construction and operation of the Project. Baseline conditions for ecological components
of the terrestrial and associated aquatic environment were evaluated based on
information from available literature and recent ecological field update
surveys conducted during both dry and wet seasons for the purposes of this
ecological impact assessment. Measures
required to mitigate any identified ecological impacts have been recommended,
where appropriate.
7.2
Relevant Legislation & Assessment Criteria
The criteria for evaluating terrestrial ecological impacts
are laid out in the EIAO-TM and EIA
Study Brief (ESB-200/2009). Annex
16 of the EIAO-TM sets out the
general approach and methodology for the assessment of impacts to ecological
resources arising from a project or proposal.
Annex 8 of the EIAO-TM recommends the criteria that can
be used for evaluating such impacts.
Relevant legislative requirements and evaluation
criteria relevant to this Study for the protection of species and habitats of
terrestrial ecological importance are summarised as follows:
·
Forests and Countryside Ordinance (Cap
96);
·
Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap
170);
·
Protection of Endangered Species of
Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap 586);
·
Town Planning Ordinance (Cap 131);
·
Environment Impact Assessment
Ordinance (Cap. 499)
·
·
United Nations Convention on Biodiversity
(1992);
·
Convention on Wetlands of International
Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat (the Ramsar Convention); and
·
PRC Regulations and Guidelines.
Details on each of the above are presented below.
7.2.1
Technical Memorandum on Environmental
Impact Assessment Process under the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance
(EIAO-TM)
Annex 16 of the EIAO-TM sets out the general approach and methodology for assessment
of ecological impacts arising from a project or proposal, to allow a complete
and objective identification, prediction and evaluation of the potential
ecological impacts. Annex 8 recommends the criteria that can be used for evaluating
ecological impacts.
7.2.2
Forests and Countryside Ordinance (Cap 96)
The Forests and
Countryside Ordinance (Cap 96)
prohibits the felling, cutting, burning or destroying of trees and growing
plants in forests and plantations on Government land. The subsidiary Forestry Regulations prohibit the picking, felling or possession of
listed rare and protected plant species.
The list of protected species in
7.2.3
Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap
170)
Under the Wild
Animals Protection Ordinance (WAPO) (Cap 170), designated wild animals are protected
from being hunted, whilst their nests and eggs are protected from destruction
and removal. All wild birds and most
mammals, including all cetaceans, are protected under this Ordinance, as well
as certain reptiles, amphibians and invertebrates. The Second
Schedule of the Ordinance that lists all the animals protected was last
revised in June 1997.
7.2.4
Protection of Endangered Species of
Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap 586)
The Protection
of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap 586) was enacted to align
7.2.5
Town Planning Ordinance (Cap 131)
The amended Town
Planning Ordinance provides for the designation of areas such as “Coastal Protection
Areas”, “Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs)”, “Green Belt” and
"Conservation Area” to promote conservation or protection or protect
significant habitat.
7.2.6
Chapter 10 of
the HKPSG covers planning
considerations relevant to conservation.
This chapter details the principles of conservation, the conservation of
natural landscape and habitats, historic buildings, archaeological sites and
other antiquities. It also addresses the
issue of enforcement. The appendices
list the legislation and administrative controls for conservation, other
conservation related measures in
7.2.7
Other Relevant Legislation
The Peoples’ Republic of
The Convention
on Wetlands of International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat (the Ramsar Convention) applies to the HKSAR.
The Convention requires parties to conserve and make wise use of wetland
areas, particularly those supporting waterfowl populations. Article
1 of the Convention defines wetlands as ‘areas of marsh, fen, peatland or
water, whether natural or artificial, permanent or temporary, with water that
is static or flowing, fresh, brackish or salt, including areas of marine water
the depth of which at low tide does not exceed six meters.’. The Mai Po/Inner Deep Bay wetland was
declared a Wetland of International Importance (“Ramsar site”) under the
Convention in 1995.
The PRC in 1988 ratified the Wild Animal Protection Law of the PRC, which lays down basic
principles for protecting wild animals.
The Law prohibits killing of protected animals, controls hunting, and
protects the habitats of wild animals, both protected and non-protected. The Law also provides for the creation of
lists of animals protected at the state level, under Class I and Class II. There are 96 animal taxa in Class I and 161
in Class II. Class I provides a higher
level of protection for animals considered to be more threatened.
7.3
Description of the Study Area
Within the HKSAR boundary, the Study Area was defined
as the area within 500 m of the Project Site boundary, including the
improvement works of an approximately 4.5km long section of Shenzhen River
(hereafter “the river modification and associated works”) and re-provision of a
boundary patrol road and boundary security fence of about 4.5km in length
(hereafter “the advanced works”) (see Figure
7.1). The Study Area for aquatic
ecology also included those areas covered by the water quality impact
assessment including
The Shenzhen River runs though the centre of the
Study Area westwards, mainly in an unchannelised section from Pak Fu Shan to Ta
Kwu Ling and also in a small channelised section running west from where it
intersects with the Ping Yuen River (also channelised). It forms the official boundary between the
HKSAR and the
To the south of the
7.4
Recognized Sites of Conservation Importance
Downstream of the Study Area along the
7.4.1
The Mai
Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site covers the Mai Po Marshes SSSI, the
Table 7.1 Bird
species of global conservation concern recorded at
Species |
Global IUCN Status |
Occurrence at |
Regularly Recorded |
||
Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus |
Vulnerable |
Winter visitor |
Swinhoe's/ Chinese Egret Egretta eulophotes |
Vulnerable |
Passage migrant |
Black-faced Spoonbill Platalea minor |
Endangered |
Winter Visitor |
Falcated Duck Anas falcata |
Near Threatened |
Winter Visitor |
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca |
Near Threatened |
Winter Visitor |
Greater Spotted Eagle |
Vulnerable |
Winter Visitor |
Imperial Eagle |
Vulnerable |
Winter Visitor |
Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa |
Near Threatened |
Passage migrant and winter
visitor |
Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquatus |
Near Threatened |
Passage migrant and winter
visitor |
Nordmann's Greenshank Tringa guttifer |
Endangered |
Passage migrant |
Asian Dowitcher Limnodromus semipalmatus |
Near Threatened |
Passage migrant |
Spoon-billed Sandpiper Eurynorhynchus pygmaeus |
Critically Endangered |
Passage migrant |
Relict Gull Larus relictus |
Vulnerable |
Winter visitor |
Saunders's Gull Larus saundersi |
Vulnerable |
Winter visitor |
Styan's Grasshopper Warbler Locustella pleskei |
Vulnerable |
Winter visitor |
Manchurian Reed Warbler Acrocephalus tangorum |
Vulnerable |
Passage migrant |
Yellow-breasted Bunting Emberiza aureola |
Vulnerable |
Passage migrant |
Collared Crow Corvus torquatus |
Near Threatened |
Local resident and breeder |
Less Frequently Recorded |
||
Christmas Island
Frigatebird Fregata andrewsi |
Critically Endangered |
Single record (1997) |
Oriental Stork Ciconia boyciana |
Endangered |
Historical winter visitor |
Black-headed Ibis Threskiornis melanocephalus |
Near Threatened |
Historical winter vi |
Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus |
Vulnerable |
Single record (2007) |
Baikal Teal Anas |
Vulnerable |
Occasional winter visitor |
Baer's Pochard Aythya baeri |
Endangered |
Occasional winter visitor |
Eurasian Black Vulture Aegypius monachus |
Near Threatened |
Historical winter visitor |
Siberian Crane Grus leucogeranus |
Critically Endangered |
Single record (2002) |
Japanese Swamp Warbler Megalurus pryeri |
Vulnerable |
Two records (2007, 2009) |
Brown-chested Jungle
Flycatcher Rhinomyias brunneata |
Vulnerable |
Terrestrial species |
Japanese Terpsiphone atrocaudata |
Near Threatened |
Terrestrial species |
Japanese Yellow Bunting Emberiza sulphurata |
Vulnerable |
Terrestrial species |
7.4.2
Mai Po Marshes and
The Mai Po Marshes were designated as SSSI
on 15 September 1976 and the Inner Deep
Bay was designated as SSSI on 18 March 1986. They now fall within the Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site.
The marshes contain the largest and most important area of dwarf
mangrove in
7.4.3
The
7.4.4
Wetland Conservation Area
In order to
conserve the ecological value of the existing contiguous and adjoining active/abandoned
fishponds in the Deep Bay Area, which form an integral part of the wetland
ecosystem, a Wetland Conservation Area (WCA) was designated by the Town
Planning Board ([6]). It mitigates the negative
impact arising from undesirable land uses and human disturbance, by protecting
the ecological resources of the wetland and fishponds and conserves the
integrity of the
7.4.5
Wetland Buffer Area
The Wetland
Buffer Area (WBA) is a buffer area of about 500m landward of the WCA
boundary. A substantial number of the
fishponds within the WBA have been filled and certain areas degraded by the
presence of open storage use. These
degraded areas may be considered as target areas to allow an appropriate level
of residential/recreational development so as to provide an incentive to remove
the open storage and/or restore some of the lost fishponds.
7.5
Literature Review of Terrestrial Ecological Resources within the Study Area
A literature review was conducted to
characterise the existing condition within the Study Area and to identify
habitats and species of potential importance in the area. The literature review included Government and
private sector reports, independent and Government published literature,
vegetation maps and land use maps.
Reviewed information included, but was not limited to, the following:
·
·
Construction
of a Secondary Boundary Fence and new sections of Primary Boundary Fence and
·
Stream
Improvement at Ta Kwu Ling associated with the Resite of Chuk Yuen Village ([9]);
and
·
Land Use Planning for Closed Area -
Feasibility Study ([10])
Ecological surveys covering both wet and dry seasons
have been conducted along various sections of the
7.5.1
Habitat and Vegetation
According to the literature review, habitats found in
the Study Area included woodland (including Fung Shui woodland), shrubland,
plantation, pond, abandoned fish pond, marsh, wet and dry agricultural land,
abandoned agricultural land/low-lying grassland, hillside grassland,
stream/river, drainage channel and developed area ([14])
([15]). At least 99 floral species were recorded in
the Study area but from the reviewed literature, information about the
vegetation found in each habitat type within the Study Area is limited to those
detailed below.
The
Fung Shui woodland was reportedly found at Kan Tau Wai, south of Ta Kwu Ling
village and at Tsung Yuen Ha and was said to be dominated by Cinnamomum camphora, Celtis sinensis,
Aquilaria sinensis, Schima superba, Aporosa dioica and Syzygium levinei. The main area
of woodland was located south east of Chuk Yuen and the dominant species
included Celtis sinensis, Macaranga tanarius and Microcos paniculata.
The wet agricultural land was mainly located west of
the
The abandoned agricultural land/low-lying grassland
was dominated by Mikania micrantha,
Paspalum conjugatum, Panicum maximum as well as Bidens alba and Pennisetum
purpureum.
The abandoned fish pond was dominated by Cyclosorus interruptus, Panicum maximum
and Phragmites australis.
One species of conservation interest was recorded,
Incense Tree Aquilaria sinensis,
including one individual found at the edge of the abandoned fish pond south of
Chuk Yuen ([16]).
7.5.2
Mammals
According to the literature review including data
from a mammal camera trap survey conducted by AFCD from 2002-2006 in woodland
near Chuk Yuen, at least twelve mammal species were recorded in the Study Area,
including, Small-toothed Ferret
Badger Melogale moschata, Domestic
Dog Canis lupus familiaris, Domestic
Cat Felis catus and Eurasian Wild Pig
Sus scrofa. Night surveys in the area recorded the
Roof Rat Rattus rattus and the Brown
Rat Rattus norvegicus. In addition species of conservation
interest recorded during the camera trap survey included Small Asian Mongoose Herpestes javanicus, Small Indian Civet Viverricula indica, East Asian Porcupine
Hystrix brachyura, Leopard Cat Prionailurus bengalensis, Masked Palm
Civet Paguma larvata and Red Muntjac Muntiacus muntjak ([17]) (See
Annex D, Table 2 for details). Ecological field surveys conducted as part of
the land use planning feasibility study ([18])
also recorded East Asian Porcupine Hystrix
brachyura at Lin Ma Hang Road, just outside the northern boundary of the
Study Area.
7.5.3
Birds
According to the literature review at least 35 bird
species were definitely recorded in the Study Area, including five species of conservation
interest; Black Kite Milvus migrans,
Crested Serpent Eagle Spilornis cheela,
Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis,
Lesser Coucal Centropus bengalensis
and Hwamei Garrulax canorus ([19])
(see Annex D, Table 4). Locations of further bird species recorded in
the other studies reviewed were not precise enough to be ensure they were of
relevance to the current study.
The Black
Kite, Crested Serpent Eagle, Hwamei and Greater Coucal were all recorded in
woodland near Chuk Yuen village. The
Greater Coucal was also recorded in abandoned and active agricultural land in
this area, as was the Lesser Coucal. The
Lesser Coucal was also recorded in habitat reported as shrubland, to the south
east of Chuk Yuen village.
To the
south of the Study Area, 17 bird species of conservation importance and
wetland-dependant species were recorded during previous field surveys ([20])
in the agricultural lands at Chow Tin Tsuen such as Little
Egret Egretta garzetta, Cattle Egret Bubulcus coromandus, Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus, White-breasted Waterhen
Amaurornis phoenicurus and Greater
Painted Snipe Rostratula benghalensis.
The above-mentioned field surveys ([21])
also recorded 9 bird species of conservation importance at
the agricultural areas in Tsung Yuen Ha and Heung Yuen Wai such as
White-breasted Waterhen, Lesser Coucal and Yellow-breasted Bunting Emberiza aureola.
7.5.4
Herpetofauna (Amphibians & Reptiles)
According to the literature review at least five amphibians including Asiatic Painted Frog Kaloula pulchra, Paddy Frog Rana
limnocharis ,Common Toad Bufo
melanostictus, Brown Tree Frog Plypedates
megacephalus and Chinese Bullfrog Hoplobatrachus
chinensis and three reptiles, Chinese Gecko Gekko chinensis , Checkered
Keelback Xenochrophis piscator and Burmese Python Python molurus
bivittatus were
recorded in the Study Area ([22])
([23])([24])([25])
(see Annex D, Table 6
& 8). Among these species, Chinese Bullfrog and
Buremese Python are regarded as species of conservation interest.
7.5.5
Butterflies & Dragonflies
According to the literature review at least 29
butterfly species and 16 dragonfly species were recorded in the
Study Area ([26])([27]) , of which butterfly Small Three-ring Ypthima norma and Spotted Angle Caprona alida recorded at Tsung
Yuen Ha and Tawny Hooktail (Paragomphus capricornis) recorded at Chow Tin are species of conservation interest (see Annex D, Tables 10 & 12).
7.5.6
Aquatic Fauna
According to the literature review approximately ten
aquatic fauna species were recorded in the Study Area including Chinese Barb Puntius semifasciolatus, Chinese
Catfish Clarias fuscus, Nile Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus, Mosquito fish Gambusia affinis, Common Carp Cyprinus carpio, Freshwater Shrimps Caridina cantonensis and Macrobrachium hainanence, Goldfish Carassius auratus and Guppy Poecilia reticulata and Apple Snail Pomacea lineatai found in ditches.
No fish species of conservation interest was recorded
within the Study Area from previous field surveys as part of
the land use planning feasibility study ([28]).
7.6
Ecological Baseline Surveys - Methodologies
In order to verify the information collected,
supplement the existing ecological information and fulfil the objectives of the
EIA study, six
months of ecological field surveys (covering both wet and dry seasons) were
conducted from August 2009 to January 2010.
The Study Areas within
the HKSAR boundary and Shenzhen boundary were defined as the area within 500m
and 200m from the Project Site boundary, respectively.
The ecological surveys were aimed at establishing an
updated general ecological profile of the Study Area and describing the
characteristics of each habitat found.
The methodology of the ecological surveys made reference to the
technical guidelines of ecological assessment in Annex 16 of EIAO-TM and
the related Guidance Notes (GN 7/2002 and GN 10/2004). They were designed to identify the existing
ecological status of the area in order to facilitate this ecological impact
assessment and to recommend any appropriate mitigation measures. Details of the methodologies employed in the ecological
surveys undertaken for the assessment are provided below.
7.6.1
Habitat and vegetation surveys
Field
surveys focusing on habitat and vegetation within the Study Area were performed in the Study Area within
the HKSAR boundary in September, November and December 2009 (covering both the
wet and dry seasons). Special attention
was given to plant species of conservation interest. The aim of the surveys was to record
ecological data within the Study Area, and establish or update the ecological
profile.
Habitats were mapped based on government aerial
photos (year 2008) and field ground truthing, and with reference to the
habitat map presented in the approved Secondary Boundary Fence EIA Report ([29]).
Representative areas of each habitat type were surveyed on foot. Plant species of each habitat type
encountered and their relative abundance were recorded
with special attention given to rare or protected species. Nomenclature and conservation status of plant
species follow Xing et al. (2000) ([30]),
Wu and Lee (2000) ([31]),
Siu (2000) ([32]),
AFCD (2003) ([33])
and AFCD (2004) ([34]).
7.6.2
Wildlife surveys
Wildlife surveys included day and night-time surveys,
covering both the wet and dry seasons (see Box
1).
Box 1 – Surveyed Months for Wildlife Surveys
Survey Type |
Surveyed Months (Daytime) |
Surveyed Months (Night-time) |
Mammal Surveys |
2009 - August,
September, October, November and December 2010 - January |
2009 - September, October,
November and December 2010 - January |
Bird Surveys |
2009 - August,
September, October, November and December 2010 - January |
2009 - September,
October, November and December 2010 - January |
Herpetofauna Surveys |
2009 - August, September,
October, November and December 2010 - January |
2009 - September,
October, November and December 2010 - January |
Odonates and Butterflies
Surveys |
2009 - August,
September, October, November and December 2010 - January |
2009 - September, October,
November and December 2010 - January |
For the Study Area within the HKSAR boundary,
qualitative and some quantitative data were recorded from transects and using
the point count method. The locations of
sampling points and transects are shown in Figure
7.3.
Mammals
As most mammals occurred at low densities, all sightings,
tracks, and signs of mammals (including droppings) were actively searched along
the survey transects (see Figure
7.3) and special attention was paid to observing
or looking for evidence of bats and the Eurasian Otter Lutra lutra. Nomenclature for mammals follows AFCD (2006) ([35]).
No quantification of abundance of mammals in the Study Area was made,
due to the difficulties in translating sights and tracks (eg burrows) to actual
abundance.
Birds
The
bird communities of the major habitats (ie secondary woodland, shrubby
grassland, low-lying grassland, cultivated land, abandoned agricultural land,
plantation, stream/river, channel, pond and developed area) within the Study
Area were surveyed using the transect/ point count method subject to the
on-site conditions. Ten minutes were
spent counting birds at each sampling point, and all birds seen or heard within
30 m of each point were counted and identified to species level where
possible. Birds flying directly overhead at each sampling point (eg birds of prey,
swifts and swallows, corvids) were also included in the sampling point
records. Signs of breeding (eg nests, recently fledged
juveniles) within the Hong Kong SAR Study Area were also recorded, if any. Observations were made using 8x binoculars
and photographic records were taken, if possible. Bird species encountered outside
counting points but within the Hong Kong Study Area were also recorded to
produce a complete species list.
Ornithological nomenclature in this report follows Viney et
al (2006) ([36]).
Herpetofauna
Herpetofauna surveys were conducted through direct
observation and active searching in all major representative habitat types
along survey transects and in potential hiding places such as among leaf
litter, inside holes and under stones and logs within the Study Area. Auditory detection of species-specific calls
was also used to survey frogs and toads.
During the surveys, all reptiles and amphibians sighted and heard were
recorded.
Nomenclature and status used for reptiles follows
Karsen et al 1998 ([37])
and AFCD 2006 ([38])
while that of amphibians
follows AFCD 2005 ([39]).
Odonates and Butterflies
Odonates
and butterflies of different habitats within the Study Area were surveyed using
the transect / point count method subject to the on-site conditions. Odonates and butterflies within 10 m from
either side of the survey transect or within 30 m of each point were identified
and counted. Odonates and butterflies
encountered outside counting points but within the Study Area falling within
the HKSAR boundary were also recorded in order to produce a complete species
list. Nomenclature for butterflies in
this report follows Walthew 1997 ([40])
and Yiu 2004 ([41]),
and for odonates, nomenclature follows
7.6.3
Aquatic surveys
Streams
identified within the Study Area were visited and surveyed for freshwater fish
in September 2009 and February 2010, covering both the wet and dry
seasons. Freshwater fish were studied by
methods including bank side observation, active search using hand nets, and
fish capturing using fish cages and gillnets.
Freshwater fish were recorded and identified to the lowest possible
taxonomic level. Nomenclature for fish
in this report follows Lee et al
(2004) ([43]).
7.7
Ecological Baseline Surveys - Results
7.7.1
Habitat and Vegetation
Habitats found in the Study Area included Woodland
(including two small patches of Fung Shui Woodland at Kan Tau
Wai and at Tsung Yuen Ha), Plantation,
Shrubby Grassland, Low-lying Grassland, Marshy Low-lying Grassland, Abandoned
Agricultural Land, Cultivated Land, Stream/River, Channel, Pond and Developed
Area. Habitats found are shown in the
habitat map (see Figures
7.4a-c). Photographic records of
the various habitats found in the Study Area within the
Table 7.2 Plant
Species Recorded within Each Habitat of Study Area within the HKSAR Boundary
Habitat |
Number of Plant Species Total (Wet / Dry Season) |
Area (ha) |
|
90 (86/87) |
~20.4 |
|
53 (45/49) |
~ 3.1 |
Shrubby Grassland |
70 (59/60) |
~44.3 |
Low-lying Grassland |
54 (42/47) |
~11.3 |
Marshy Low-lying
Grassland |
54 (42/47) |
~6.6 |
Abandoned Agricultural
Land |
84 (58/76) |
~82.5 |
Cultivated Land (Dry) |
95 (64/75) |
~55.2 |
Wet Active Agricultural
Land |
23 (19/14) |
~1.6 |
Stream / River |
45 (37/38) |
~ 2.8 (6.0 km) |
Channel |
45 (29/38) |
~ 9.1 (3.6 km) |
Pond |
37 (28/34) |
~ 0.5 |
Developed Area (including
road /. Path) |
68 (60/45) |
~38.2 |
TOTAL |
286 (250/135) |
~276 |
Small patches of secondary woodland were found
throughout the HKSAR Study Area with two small patches of fung shui woodland
located near Kan Tau Wai and at Tsung Yuen Ha.
Tree species that were most commonly found in the woodland were all
native. Schefflera heptaphylla was the most abundant tree species found
with other tree species such as Aporusa
dioica, Macaranga tanarius, Sterculia lanceolata and Zanthoxylum avicennae also widely
recorded. The understory was dominated
by the native shrubs Psychotria asiatica
and Bridelia tomentosa with climbers
including Dalbergia benthamii, Dalbergia hancei, Cassytha filiformis, Cansjera rheedii and Eleutherococcus trifoliatus and the exotic species Mikania micrantha. Five species of very common ferns were
recorded, all native, with two in high abundance, Lygodium japonicum and Adiantum
flabellulatum.
The fung shui woodland near Kan Tau Wai was dominated
by Bambusa spp. as well as some individuals of Ficus microcarpa,
Macaranga tanarius, Bischofia javanica and Dimocarpus logan. The
dominant species recorded in the fung
shui woodland near Tsung Yuen Ha included Machilus cf.
kwangtungensis, Schefflera heptaphylla and Cinnamomum camphora.
Overall, 90 species of plants were recorded within
the woodland habitat, with almost equal numbers in the wet and dry seasons (86
and 87 species respectively). 83 species
were found in both wet and dry seasons and the only species of conservation
interest recorded in the whole Study Area, the Incense Tree Aquilaria sinensis, was recorded in the
fung shui woodland near Tsung Yuen Ha (for location refer to Figure
7.8). Aquilaria sinensis is a common tree in
The floristic diversity of woodland was
moderate. A photographic record of
secondary woodland and fung shui woodland is shown in Figure 7.5.
Small plantation patches were found in the Study Area
within the HKSAR boundary. The
plantation was located in three small patches to the west, middle and north of
the Study Area. A tiny area of
plantation can be found at the north-eastern end of the Project Site, belonging
to a small patch which predominantly falls outside the Project Site.
Within the HKSAR Study Area, a total of 53 different
species of plants were found, 45 in the wet season and 49 in the dry season,
with 41 species recorded in both seasons.
The dominant trees were exotic species, including Acacia confusa and Lophostemon
confertus. Understory plants
included the climbers Eleutherococcus
trifoliatus and Mikania micrantha.
No plant species of conservation interested were
recorded in this habitat. The floristic
diversity of plantation was low to moderate.
A photographic record of plantation is shown in Figure 7.5.
Shrubby Grassland
Shrubby grassland habitat was found in the HKSAR
Study Area, principally in three medium-sized patches; one in the south, one in
the mid-east and one in the north.
Overall 70 species of plant were found in this
habitat with an almost identical number found in the wet and dry seasons (59
and 60 species respectively). 49 species
were found in both seasons, including the tree Celtis sinensis, the climber Mikania
micrantha and the herb Bidens pilosa
var. radiata which were all found in high abundance in both seasons. The shrub Lantana
camara was abundant in both seasons, whereas the herb Microstegium vagans, while abundant in the dry season, was not
recorded in the wet season.
The floristic diversity of shrubby grassland was low
to moderate. A photographic record of
shrubby grassland is shown in Figure
7.5.
Low-lying Grassland and Marshy Low-lying Grassland
Low-lying grassland and marshy low-lying grassland
were found mainly bordering the river channel within the Project Site but also
outside the Project Site in the HKSAR Study Area. These habitats, in particular marshy
low-lying grassland, could be flooded and become marshy during heavy storms,
and the strong flushing water flow restricts the diversity of the associated
vegetation. The habitat structure and
species diversity of the marshy low-lying grassland is very similar to
low-lying grassland but more frequent to be flooded after storms. The habitat boundary of the marshy low-lying
grassland is mainly defined by the predicted extent of 1 in 2 year flood (Figure
1.2). 54 species of plant were
found in these two habitats, with similar numbers of species in the wet and dry
seasons (42 and 47 species respectively) and 35 species found in both seasons. The climbers Mikania micrantha and Ipomoea
cairica and the herbs Neyraudia
reynaudianai and Tithonia
diversifolia were abundant in both the wet and dry seasons, as was the
shrub Lantana camara.
No species of conservation interest were
recorded. The floristic diversity of
low-lying grassland and marshy low-lying grassland was low to moderate. A photographic record of low-lying grassland
and marshy low-lying grassland is shown in Figure
7.5.
Abandoned Agricultural Land
Abandoned agricultural land was, with
No species of conservation interest were recorded.
The floristic diversity of abandoned agricultural
land was moderate. A photographic record
of abandoned agricultural land is shown in Figure
7.6.
Cultivated Land (Dry)
Cultivated land, as mentioned previously, along with
abandoned agricultural land, was the predominant habitat type in the Study Area
falling within the HKSAR boundary. The
cultivated land was dry land and was mainly recorded in the Study Area but was
outside of the Project Site. Vegetables
were the main crops with some fruit trees also found in orchards. Overall, 95 species were found in this
habitat, with a higher number of species found in the dry season (75) compared
to the wet season (64). 44 species were
recorded in both seasons, including the banana plant (herb) Musa x paradisiaca.
21 plant species classified as ‘restricted’ were
recorded in this habitat, including three native herbs (Chenopodium ficifolium, Cyperus
exaltatus and Polygonum plebeium)
and one native climber (Cardiospermum
halicacabum), which were only recorded in the dry season and four herbs (Dicliptera chinensis, Lindernia crustacean,
Ludwigia decurrens and Physalis
angulata) which were only recorded in the wet season. No species of conservation interest were
recorded in this habitat.
The floristic diversity of cultivated land was
moderate. A photographic record of
cultivated land is shown in Figure
7.6.
Wet Active Agricultural Land
A small area of wet, active agricultural land was located
at the southern part of the Study Area, next to the
The floristic diversity of wet active agricultural
land was low.
Stream / River
45 plant species were recorded in the Study Area
within the HKSAR boundary, with almost identical numbers in the wet and dry
season (37 and 38 respectively) and 30 found in both including a Commelina species of herb, the
restricted, native shrub, Vitex negundo
var. cannabifolia and the restricted, native climber Merremia hederacea. The
common, exotic herb Cyperus o
No plant species of conservation interested were
recorded in this habitat overall. The
floristic diversity of stream /river was low.
Photographic records of stream and river are shown in Figure
7.7.
Channel
Channel habitat was found in the Study Area within
the
Overall 45 species of plant were found in channel
habitat, with more in the dry season (38) than the wet season (29). 22 species were found in both seasons
including all species previous mentioned as occurring in abundance and others
including the trees Acacia auriculiformis
and Macarange tanarius, the climber Mikania micrantha, the herbs Ludwigia hyssopifolia and Polygonum lapathifoliumi and the shrub Lindera communis.
No plant species of conservation interest were
recorded. The floristic diversity of the
channel habitats was low. Photographic
records of channel are shown in Figure
7.6.
Pond (active and abandoned)
Ponds, both active and abandoned, were found in the
Study Area within the HKSAR boundary.
One such active pond was located adjacent to Ling Ma Hang road and north
of Heung Yuen Wai. The remaining ponds
recorded within the Study Area were found to be abandoned.
Overall 37 plant species were found in this habitat,
28 in the wet season and 34 in the dry season, with 25 species found in both
seasons. The herb Hedyotis corymbosa was found in very high abundance in both
seasons, while the climber Mikania
micrantha and the herb Scoparia dulcis
were found in very high abundance in the dry season and less abundance in the
wet season. Eight plant species
including six herbs (Conyza
sumatrensis, Eclipta prostrate, Emilia sonchifolia, Ludwigia hyssopifolia,
Rorippa indicia and
Solanum americanum) were only found in the dry season and three, including
two herbs Synedrella nodiflora and Youngia japonica) were only
found in the wet season.
All plant species found in this habitat were either
common or very common and no plant species of conservation interest were
recorded. The floristic diversity of
pond was low. A photographic record of
pond and abandoned pond is shown in Figure
7.7.
Developed Area (including road / path)
Developed area found throughout the entire the Study
Area, comprising villages, roads, paths, parks and wasteland. In the Study Area within the
No plant species of conservation interest were found
in this habitat type. The floristic
diversity of developed area was low to moderate. A photographic record of developed area is
shown in Figure
7.6.
7.7.2
Mammals
A total of
eight mammal species were recorded during the surveys. Very few mammals were recorded during day
time surveys; sightings and tracks of Eurasian Wild Pig Sus scrofa were
recorded as well as one road-killed East Asian / Malayan
Porcupine Hystrix brachyura being
observed. During the night surveys in
the Study Area within the HKSAR boundary, seven mammal species were recorded, including
at least three different unidentified species of bat, Leopard Cat Prionailurus
bengalensis, Small
Indian Civet Viverricula indica, Eurasian Wild Pig Sus scrofa and Musk Shrew Suncus murinus
(Annex D). All bats are protected under the Wild
Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap. 170) in
East Asian / Malayan Porcupine although abundant in
The Leopard Cat is uncommon in
The Small Indian Civet, although abundant in
7.7.3
Birds
There were
a total of 88 species of birds recorded in the Study Area within the HKSAR
boundary, during the ecological surveys (see Annex D). Nine species were recorded only in the wet
season, 35 species only in the dry season and 44 were recorded in both seasons.
Relative abundance and species richness of birds in
each type of surveyed habitat, based only on the results of the point count
method of the surveys, are shown in Table
7.3. Shrubby grassland showed the
highest mean abundance of birds in the wet season, whereas in the dry season,
channel had the highest mean abundance of birds followed closely by abandoned
agricultural land. In terms of species
richness, plantation, cultivated land, channel and pond all showed low species
richness in the wet season, but only pond was still low in the dry season. Channel actually had the highest species
richness in the dry season, closely followed by plantation. Stream and woodland also recorded high
species richness in the dry season.
Among the bird species recorded there are 26 species
of conservation interest; eleven species are PRC nationally protected species, four are listed in
CITES Appendix 2 and one in CITES Appendix 1 and ten are protected under Protection of Endangered Species of Animals
and Plants Ordinance, (Cap 586)
(NB all bird species in Hong Kong are also protected under Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (WAPO) (Cap. 170). The
26 species recorded included, Crested Serpent Eagle Spilornis cheela, Besra Accipiter
virgatus, Black Kite Milvus migrans,
Common Buzzard Buteo buteo, Peregrine
Falcon Falco peregrinus, Greater
Spotted Eagle Aquila clanga,
Bonelli's Eagle Hieraaetus fasciatus,
Savanna Nightjar Caprimulgus affinis, Emerald Dove Chalcophaps indica, Greater Coucal Centropus
sinensis, Lesser Coucal Centropus bengalensis,
Asian Barred Owlet / Cuckoo Owl Glaucidium
cuculoides, Japanese Sparrowhawk Accipiter
gularis, Crested Goshawk Accipiter
trivirgatus ,Greater Painted Snipe Rostratula
benghalensis, Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola
bacchus, Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax
nycticorax, Grey Heron Ardea cinerea,
Great Egret Casmerodius albus,
Intermediate Egret Egretta intermedia,
Little Egret Egretta garzetta, Cattle
Egret Bubulcus ibis, Little Green
Heron Butorides striatus, Common Teal Anas crecca, White-breasted Waterhen Amaurornis
phoenicurus and Yellow-breasted
Bunting Emberiza aureola.
The Crested Serpent Eagle is a Class 2 Protected
Animal of PRC and being a member of the Falconiformes is listed in CITES Appendix 2. It is listed as “Vulnerable” in
The Besra
is protected under Cap 586 in
The Black Kite is a very widespread and common
species in
The Common Buzzard is a Class 2 Protected Animal of
PRC and being a member of the Falconiformes is listed in CITES Appendix 2. It is protected under Cap 586 in
The Peregrine Falcon is listed in Appendix 1 of CITES as well as being a
Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC and protected by Cap 586 in
The Greater Spotted Eagle is a Class 1 Protected
Animal of PRC and protected under Cap 586
in
Bonelli's
Eagle is a Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC and is listed as “Rare” in
The Savanna Nightjar Caprimulgus affinis, an uncommon (but potentially rare) resident
and passage migrant in
Emerald Dove
is
categorised as ”Vulnerable”
in the
The Greater Coucal is a Class 2 Protected Animal in
the PRC and is categorised as ”Vulnerable” in
The Lesser Coucal is a Class 2 Protected Animal in
PRC and is categorised as ”Vulnerable” in
The Asian Barred Owlet / Cuckoo Owl is a Class 2 Protected Animal of the PRC
and is protected under Cap 586 in
The
Japanese Sparrowhawk is
protected under Cap 586 in
The Crested Goshawk is a Class 2 Protected Animal of
PRC and being a member of the Falconiformes is listed in CITES Appendix 2. It is listed as “Rare” in
Two Greater Painted Snipe were seen among the
vegetation in the Ping Yuen channel in the south of the Study Area, located at
least 200 m from the Project Site boundary.
It was unclear from their plumages whether they were adult males or
juvenile males/females. Greater Painted
Snipe is a passage migrant in
Eight
ardeid species recorded during the surveys are considered of “potential
regional concern”, while Common
Teal, White-breasted Waterhen and Yellow-breasted Bunting are
considered of “regional concern” by Fellowes et al ([48]). Yellow-breasted Bunting is also listed as
Vulnerable in the IUCN Red List. The
breeding population of Little Egret, Chinese Pond Heron and Great Egret are
considered of “regional concern” (1). However, no breeding of these species was
recorded within the Study Area. Chinese
Pond Herons were found in various habitats including stream, abandoned
agricultural land, channel, developed area and marshy low-lying grassland. Black-crowned Night Herons were found in
stream habitat during daytime surveys and stream and channel habitats during
night time surveys. Grey Herons were
found in stream, channel and marshy low-lying grassland habitats. Great Egrets and one Intermediate Egret were
only found in stream habitat. Little
Egrets were found in stream, pond, marshy low-lying grassland and developed
area habitat. One Cattle Egret was
recorded in cultivated land outside the Project Site. Little Green Herons were recorded outside the
Project Site in secondary woodland during daytime surveys and along streams
during night time surveys. Common
Teal was recorded within the Project Site in the stream habitat and White-breasted Waterhen was found in
various habitats including stream, marshy low-lying grassland, abandoned
agricultural land and pond habitats.
Table 7.3 Bird
Species Recorded with Each Habitat of the HKSAR Study Area
|
HKSAR
Study Area |
|||||||||
|
|
|
Shrubby Grassland |
Low-lying Grassland/
Marshy Low-lying Grassland |
Abandoned Agricultural
Land |
Cultivated Land (Dry) (1) |
Stream |
Channel |
Pond |
Developed Area |
Wet
Season |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean
Abundance of Birds (Mean # birds per sampling point) |
4.00 |
20.50 |
22.50 |
10.00 |
15.67 |
9.00 |
14.60 |
10.50 |
9.00 |
12.00 |
Species
Richness ( Mean # of species per sampling point) |
3.00 |
11.00 |
7.00 |
7.00 |
7.67 |
4.50 |
8.40 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
4.50 |
Total
# of Species Recorded (included transect and point count data) |
10 |
32 |
18 |
16 |
30 |
18 |
40 |
27 |
11 |
20 |
Dry
Season |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean
Abundance of Birds (Mean # birds per sampling point) |
21.50 |
21.25 |
17.50 |
31.00 |
51.33 |
22.25 |
30.80 |
58.25 |
12.00 |
26.75 |
Species
Richness ( Mean # of species per sampling point) |
11.00 |
10.25 |
6.00 |
6.50 |
9.83 |
8.75 |
10.10 |
11.25 |
5.50 |
8.75 |
Total
# of Species Recorded (included transect and point count data) |
16 |
36 |
21 |
16 |
39 |
26 |
47 |
38 |
13 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) This included
the wet active agricultural land.
7.7.4
Herpetofauna (Amphibians & Reptiles)
No
herpetofauna were recorded during day time surveys. During the night surveys in the Study Area
within the HKSAR boundary, ten herpetofauna species were recorded including
seven amphibian species (Asian
Common Toad Bufo melanosticus, Gunther's
Frog Rana guentheri, Paddy Frog Fejervarya limnocharis, Chinese Bullfrog
Hoplobatrachus
chinensis, Spotted
Narrow-mouthed Frog Kalophrynus
interlineatus, Brown Tree Frog Polypedates
megacephalus and Ornate Pigmy Frog Microhyla
ornate) and one reptile species (Keelback / Striped Water Snake Xenochrophis piscator).
The Chinese Bullfrog, being a Class II protected
animal of PRC, is considered a species of conservation interest. It was recorded along the small stream of Ha
Heung Yuen (See Figure
7.8).
There were a total of 56 species of butterflies
recorded within the Study Area within the HKSAR boundary, during the ecological
surveys (see Annex D). 29 species were recorded in both the wet and
the dry season whereas 10 were recorded only during the wet season and 17 only
during the dry season.
Relative abundance and species richness of
butterflies in each type of surveyed habitat, based only on the results of the
point count method of the surveys, are shown in Table 7.4.
Most butterfly species recorded are either common or
very common in
Table 7.4 Butterfly
Species Recorded with Each Habitat of the HKSAR Study Area
|
|
|
|
|
HKSAR Study Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Shrubby Grassland |
Low-lying Grassland/
Marshy Low-lying Grassland |
Abandoned Agricultural
Land |
Cultivated Land (Dry)
(1) |
Stream |
Channel |
Pond |
Developed Area |
|||
Wet
Season |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Mean
Abundance of Butterflies (Mean # butterflies per sampling point) |
5.00 |
10.00 |
2.50 |
1.00 |
2.00 |
8.00 |
1.40 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
1.50 |
|||
Species
Richness ( Mean # of species per sampling point) |
5.00 |
8.00 |
2.50 |
1.00 |
2.00 |
5.50 |
1.40 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
1.50 |
|||
Total
# of Species Recorded (included transect and point count data) |
10 |
20 |
13 |
4 |
10 |
16 |
17 |
1 |
2 |
12 |
|||
Dry
Season |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Mean
Abundance of Butterflies (Mean # butterflies per sampling point) |
4.00 |
5.25 |
5.75 |
4.00 |
7.33 |
2.75 |
4.50 |
0.25 |
0.50 |
5.25 |
|||
Species
Richness ( Mean # of species per sampling point) |
2.50 |
4.50 |
3.75 |
3.50 |
1.67 |
1.75 |
1.70 |
0.25 |
0.50 |
4.75 |
|||
Total
# of Species Recorded (included transect and point count data) |
7 |
24 |
17 |
7 |
11 |
15 |
18 |
1 |
3 |
16 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
(1) This included the wet active agricultural land.
7.7.6
Odonates
26 species of odonates were recorded within the Study
Area during the ecological surveys (see Annex D). Eleven species were recorded only during the
wet season and four during the dry season only, while eleven species were
recorded in both the wet and the dry seasons.
Relative abundance and species richness of odonates
in each type of surveyed habitat, based only on the results of the point count
method of the surveys, are shown in Table
7.5. During the wet season, by far
the highest mean abundance of odonates was found in channel habitat and this
was largely due to a record of approximately 200 Wandering Glider Pantala flavescens individuals during
one survey in this season. Abandoned
agricultural land and cultivated land also showed high mean abundance but
channel also showed the highest species richness. Both shrubby grassland and low-lying
grassland/ marshy low-lying grassland habitats have the lowest mean abundance
and species richness in wet season. In
the dry season stream showed the highest mean abundance of odonates, closely
followed by channel, but channel again had the highest species richness. Far fewer odonates were recorded during the
dry season compared to the wet season with only one species of odonate
(Wandering Glider Pantala flavescens)
recorded in plantation, shrubby grassland and pond in the dry season.
No odonate species of conservation interest were
recorded during the surveys.
Table 7.5 Odonate
Species Recorded with Each Habitat of the HKSAR Study Area
|
|
|
|
|
HKSAR Study Area |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Shrubby Grassland |
Low-lying Grassland/
Marshy Low-lying Grassland |
Abandoned Agricultural
Land |
Cultivated Land (Dry) (1) |
Stream |
Channel |
Pond |
Developed Area |
||||
Wet
Season |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Mean
Abundance of Odonates (Mean # odonates per sampling point) |
3.00 |
17.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
33.67 |
32.00 |
3.20 |
131.00 |
3.00 |
2.00 |
||||
Species
Richness ( Mean # of species per sampling point) |
3.00 |
3.50 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
4.67 |
7.00 |
1.80 |
9.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
||||
Total
# of Species Recorded (included transect and point count data) |
4 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
11 |
11 |
12 |
16 |
2 |
6 |
||||
Dry
Season |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Mean
Abundance of Odonates (Mean # odonates per sampling point) |
2.00 |
0.75 |
1.00 |
2.00 |
0.83 |
0.50 |
6.00 |
5.75 |
1.00 |
1.50 |
||||
Species
Richness ( Mean # of species per sampling point) |
0.50 |
0.50 |
1.00 |
1.50 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
1.50 |
3.00 |
0.50 |
1.00 |
||||
Total
# of Species Recorded (included transect and point count data) |
4 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
7 |
8 |
10 |
12 |
1 |
5 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
(1) This included
the wet active agricultural land.
7.7.7
Aquatic Fauna
In total, six species, which belong to six genera and
four families, of freshwater fish species were found along the stream / rivers
within the Study Area in both the dry and wet seasons (Table 7.6). Except the
species Gambusia affinis and Oreochromis niloticus, which are
introduced and originated in
Table 7.6 Aquatic
Fauna Recorded in the Study Area
Common Name |
Species
Name |
Relative Abundance |
Distribution |
Status and
Distribution in |
Habitat
Recorded |
Family
Cichlidae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oreochromis
niloticus |
+++ |
Introduced |
Common and
widespread |
Shenzhen
river, River Ganges, Stream near Ha Heung Yuen |
Family
Poeciliidae |
|
|
|
|
|
Mosquito
Fish |
Gambusia
affinis |
+++ |
Introduced |
Common and
widespread |
Shenzhen
river, River Ganges, Stream near Ha Heung Yuen |
Family
Clariidae |
|
|
|
|
|
Chinese
Catfish |
Clarias
fuscus |
+++ |
Native /
Introduced |
Common and
widespread |
Shenzhen
river, Stream near Ha Heung Yuen |
Family
Cyprinidae |
|
|
|
|
|
Mud Carp |
Cirrhinus
molitorella |
+ |
Native /
Introduced |
Status of
this species is unavailable but it occurs in large numbers in many reservoirs
and cultivated in fishponds as food fish |
Shenzhen
river |
Common
Carp** |
Cyprinus
carpio |
+ |
Native /
Introduced |
Status of
this species is unavailable but it occurs in large numbers in many reservoirs
and cultivated in fishponds as food fish |
Shenzhen
river, Stream near Ha Heung Yuen |
Chinese
Barb |
Puntius
semifasciolatus |
+++ |
Native /
Introduced |
Common and
widespread |
River |
Note: #
+ = 0-5 individuals ++ = 5-10
individuals +++ = >10 individuals *Status and
distribution in ** Wild
population of common carp is considered Vulnerable in the IUCN Red List. The Common Carp recorded during the field
surveys is considered an introduced population (a common cultivated species
in |
Habitats recorded within the Study Area included woodland
(including two small patched of fung shui woodland), plantation, shrubby
grassland, low-lying grassland, marshy low-lying grassland, abandoned
agriculture land, cultivated land, stream / river, channel, pond and developed
area (including road/path). The
ecological importance of the habitats and wildlife identified within the Study
Area during the survey are evaluated in accordance with the EIAO-TM Annex 8 criteria, and presented in Tables 7.7 to 7.16.
The ecological value of fung shui woodland was
considered to be high. The ecological
value of woodland and stream / river (apart from the Shenzhen River) were
moderate while that of plantation, shrubby grassland, abandoned agricultural
land, marshy low-lying grassland and Shenzhen River were low to moderate. The ecological value of low-lying grassland,
wet active agricultural land, cultivated land, channel, pond and developed area
(including road / path) were all considered to be low. One small section of the
Table 7.7 Ecological Evaluation of
Criteria |
Secondary |
Fung Shui Woodland |
Naturalness |
Semi-natural
dominated by native plants. |
Semi-natural
dominated by native plants. |
Size |
Patches of secondary
woodland were recorded within the Study Area, within the HKSAR boundary. The overall size of secondary woodland was
approximately 18.0 ha. |
Two very small
patches of fung shui woodland were recorded within the Study area, with the HKSAR
boundary; near Kan Tau Wai and near Tsung Yuen Ha. The overall size of fung shui woodland was approximately
2.4 ha |
Diversity |
Moderate floral
and faunal diversity. |
Moderate floral
and faunal diversity |
Rarity |
Bird species of conservation interest included Besra
(Accipiter virgatus) flying
overhead; Black Kite (Milvus migrans)
flying overhead; Common Buzzard (Buteo
buteo) both flying overhead and perching; Japanese Sparrowhawk (Accipiter gularis) perching; Little Green Heron (Butorides striatus) perching. Some mammal
species of conservation including Small Asian Mongoose, Small Indian Civet,
East Asian Porcupine, Leopard Cat, Masked Palm Civet and Red Muntjac were
recorded in woodland near Chuk Yuen. |
Plant species of
conservation interest included Incense Tree (Aquilaria sinensis). Bird species of conservation interest included Crested Serpent Eagle (Spilornis cheela) flying overhead; Besra
(Accipiter virgatus) perching (with
possible roosting or nesting site in this habitat) |
Re-creatability |
Habitat
characteristics and species composition are natural and mature. It would take more than 30 years for the
secondary woodland to be re-created. |
Habitat
characteristics and species composition are natural and mature but cultural
significance difficult to recreate.
Given a suitable location, it would take over 30 years to re-create
the fung shui woodland |
Fragmentation |
Highly
fragmented. |
Highly
fragmented. |
Ecological Linkage |
Overall, not
functionally linked to any very highly valued habitat in close
proximity. |
Not functionally
linked to any very highly valued habitat in close proximity. |
Potential Value |
High, secondary
woodland becoming mature woodland if given time and protection from disturbance. |
High. Significant cultural and ecological value |
Nursery/Breeding
Ground |
None |
Possible breeding
ground for Besra. |
Age |
All woodland of
moderate age (around 30 years) based on tree size, woodland structure and
species composition. |
Of differing age
based on species composition and size (around 30 – 60 years) |
Abundance /
Richness of Wildlife |
Moderate
abundance / richness of fauna. |
Moderate
abundance / richness of fauna. |
Overall Ecological Value |
Moderate for secondary woodland. |
High for fung shui woodland |
Table 7.8 Ecological
Evaluation of
Criteria |
|
Naturalness |
|
Size |
Overall size of
approximately 3.1 ha. |
Diversity |
Low to moderate
floral and low faunal diversity. |
Rarity |
No plant species
of conservation interest. Bird species of
conservation interest included Besra (Accipiter
virgatus) flying overhead. |
Re-creatability |
Habitat
characteristics and species composition are easy to recreate. It will take about 10 years for the
plantation to be re-created. |
Fragmentation |
Highly fragmented
within the Study Area. |
Ecological Linkage |
Not functionally
linked to any very highly valued habitat in close proximity. |
Potential Value |
Moderate, becoming
mature woodland if given time and protection from disturbance. |
Nursery/Breeding
Ground |
None. |
Age |
Low (10-20 years)
based on tree size, woodland structure and species composition. |
Abundance /
Richness of Wildlife |
Low abundance /
richness of fauna. |
Overall Ecological Value |
Low to Moderate
|
Table 7.9 Ecological
Evaluation of Shrubby Grassland
Criteria |
Shrubby Grassland |
Naturalness |
Semi-natural
habitat with slightly more native than exotic plants. |
Size |
Three patches; one
in the south, one in the mid-east and one in the north of the Study Area
within the Hong Kong boundary, with an overall size of approximately 44.3
ha. |
Diversity |
Low to moderate
floral and faunal diversity. |
Rarity |
No plant species
of conservation interest. Bird species of
conservation interest included Common Buzzard (Buteo buteo) flying overhead; Emerald Dove (Chalcophaps
indica) perching; Lesser Coucal
(Centropus bengalensis) perching; Crested Goshawk (Accipiter
trivirgatus) flying overhead.
|
Re-creatability |
Habitat
characteristics and species composition are easy to recreate. It would take 5 to 10 years to re-create
the shrubby grassland. |
Fragmentation |
The three
principle patches are entirely separate.
Highly fragmented. |
Ecological Linkage |
Not functionally
linked to any very highly valued habitat in close proximity. |
Potential Value |
Moderate, becoming
mature shrubland if given time and protection from disturbance. |
Nursery/Breeding
Ground |
Possible breeding
ground for Emerald Dove |
Age |
Young
(<10 years) based on plant size, structure and species composition. |
Abundance /
Richness of Wildlife |
Low abundance / richness of fauna. |
Overall Ecological Value |
Low to Moderate
|
Table 7.10 Ecological
Evaluation of Low-lying Grassland and Marshy Low-lying Grassland
Criteria |
Marshy Low-lying Grassland |
Low-lying Grassland |
Naturalness |
Semi-natural
habitat, periodically disturbed by humans cutting and clearing. Also more frequent flooding by Shenzhen
river. |
Semi-natural
habitat, periodically disturbed by humans cutting and clearing. Also possible flooding by Shenzhen river. |
Size |
with an overall
size of approximately 6.6 ha. |
with an overall
size of approximately 11.3 ha. |
Diversity |
Low to moderate
floral and low faunal diversity. |
Low to moderate
floral and low faunal diversity. |
Rarity |
No plant species
of conservation interest. Bird species of
conservation interest included Chinese
Pond Heron (Ardeola bacchus) foraging; Grey Heron (Ardea cinerea)
foraging; Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) foraging; White-breasted
Waterhen (Amaurornis phoenicurus) foraging. |
No plant species
of conservation interest. Bird species of
conservation interest included Common Buzzard (Buteo buteo) flying above; Greater
Coucal (Centropus sinensis)
perching. One butterfly species of
conservation interest, Courtesan Euripus
nyctelius, was recorded. |
Re-creatability |
Habitat
characteristics and species composition are easy to recreate. |
Habitat
characteristics and species composition are easy to recreate. |
Fragmentation |
Mainly one large
and elongated patch surrounding stream / river within Study Area. Low fragmentation. |
Mainly one large
and elongated patch surrounding stream / river within Study Area. Low fragmentation. |
Ecological Linkage |
Not functionally
linked to any very highly valued habitat in close proximity. |
Not functionally
linked to any very highly valued habitat in close proximity. |
Potential Value |
Moderate, becoming mature shrubland if given time
and protection from disturbance. |
Moderate, becoming mature shrubland if given time
and protection from disturbance. |
Nursery/Breeding
Ground |
None |
Possible breeding
ground for Greater Coucal |
Age |
Young
(<10 years) based on plant size, structure and species composition. |
Young
(<10 years) based on plant size, structure and species composition. |
Abundance /
Richness of Wildlife |
Low abundance / richness of fauna |
Low abundance / richness of fauna |
Overall Ecological Value |
Low to Moderate |
Low |
Table 7.11 Ecological
Evaluation of Abandoned Agricultural Land
Criteria |
Abandoned Agricultural Land |
Naturalness |
Man-made
habitat abandoned for natural succession. |
Size |
One of the main
habitat types in the Study Area within the |
Diversity |
Moderate floral
and low to moderate faunal diversity. |
Rarity |
No plant species
of conservation interest. Bird species of
conservation interest included Common Buzzard (Buteo buteo) flying above; Savanna
Nightjar (Caprimulgus affinis)
calling; Greater Coucal (Centropus sinensis) perching; Lesser Coucal (Centropus bengalensis) perching;
Chinese Pond Heron (Ardeola bacchus) foraging; White-breasted Waterhen
(Amaurornis phoenicurus) perching. |
Re-creatability |
Habitat
characteristics and species composition are easy to re-create and may take 1
to 2 years to mature. |
Fragmentation |
Interspersed with
cultivated land but mainly linked. Low
fragmentation |
Ecological Linkage |
Not functionally
linked to any very highly valued habitat in close proximity. |
Potential Value |
Low. |
Nursery/Breeding
Ground |
Possible breeding
ground for Greater Coucal and Lesser Coucal |
Age |
Young
(<10 years) |
Abundance /
Richness of Wildlife |
Low abundance / richness of fauna |
Overall Ecological Value |
Low to Moderate
|
Table 7.12 Ecological
Evaluation of Cultivated Land (Dry)
Criteria |
Cultivated Land |
Naturalness |
Man-made
habitat actively cultivated. |
Size |
One of the main
habitat types in the Study Area within the |
Diversity |
Moderate floral
and low to moderate faunal diversity. |
Rarity |
No plant species
of conservation interest. Bird species of
conservation interest included Common Buzzard (Buteo buteo) flying above; Greater
Coucal (Centropus sinensis)
perching; Cattle Egret (Bubulcus
ibis) foraging. |
Re-creatability |
Habitat
characteristics and species composition are easy to re-create
immediately. |
Fragmentation |
Interspersed with
abandoned agricultural land but mainly linked. Low fragmentation. |
Ecological Linkage |
Not functionally
linked to any very highly valued habitat in close proximity. |
Potential Value |
Low. |
Nursery/Breeding
Ground |
Possible breeding
ground for Greater Coucal. |
Age |
Not applicable |
Abundance /
Richness of Wildlife |
Low abundance / richness of fauna |
Overall Ecological Value |
Low |
Table 7.13 Ecological
Evaluation of Wet Active Agricultural Land
Criteria |
Wet Active Agricultural Land |
Naturalness |
Man-made
habitat actively cultivated but also considered as wetland. |
Size |
A small area of
1.6ha outside the Project Site. |
Diversity |
Low in floral and
faunal diversity. |
Rarity |
No flora and fauna
species of conservation interest. |
Re-creatability |
Habitat
characteristics and species composition are easy to re-create
immediately. |
Fragmentation |
Not
applicable |
Ecological Linkage |
Not functionally
linked to any very highly valued habitat in close proximity. |
Potential Value |
Low. |
Nursery/Breeding
Ground |
None. |
Age |
Not applicable |
Abundance /
Richness of Wildlife |
Low abundance / richness of fauna |
Overall Ecological Value |
Low |
Table 7.14 Ecological
Evaluation of Stream / River
Criteria |
Natural stream/river section of
the |
Other Natural Streams within Study
Area |
Naturalness |
The stream /
river section of the |
Natural with
some disturbance observed between surveys. |
Size |
Overall size of
approximately 2.1 ha (approximately 3.4 km).
|
Overall size of approximately
0.7 ha (approximately 2.6 km). |
Diversity |
Low floral and
faunal diversity. |
Low floral and
faunal diversity. |
Rarity |
No plant species
of conservation interest. Bird species of
conservation interest included Black Kite (Milvus migrans) flying overhead; Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus) flying above
hunting; Chinese Pond Heron (Ardeola bacchus) foraging, Black-crowned Night Heron (Nycticorax nycticorax) foraging, Grey
Heron (Ardea cinerea) foraging;
Great Egret (Casmerodius albus)
foraging; Intermediate Egret (Egretta
intermedia) foraging; Little Egret (Egretta
garzetta) foraging; Common Teal (Anas
crecca) foraging; White-breasted
Waterhen (Amaurornis phoenicurus) foraging. |
No plant species
of conservation interest. Bird species of
conservation interest included Common Buzzard (Buteo buteo) perching nearby; Little
Green Heron (Butorides striatus)
foraging. Herpetofauna species of conservation interest
included Chinese Bullfrog (Hoplobatrachus chinensis). |
Re-creatability |
Habitat
characteristics are difficult to recreate. |
Habitat
characteristics are difficult to re-create. |
Fragmentation |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Ecological Linkage |
Not functionally
linked to any very highly valued habitat in close proximity. |
Not functionally
linked to any very highly valued habitat in close proximity. |
Potential Value |
Moderate to high
if given time and protection from disturbance. |
Moderate to high
if given time and protection from disturbance. |
Nursery/Breeding
Ground |
Potential breeding
and development of odonates. |
Potential breeding
and development of odonates. |
Age |
Possibly over 50
years old. |
Possibly over 50
years old. |
Abundance / Richness
of Wildlife |
Low abundance/richness of aquatic fauna. Moderate abundance / richness of
terrestrial fauna. |
Low abundance/richness of aquatic fauna. Moderate abundance / richness of
terrestrial fauna. |
Overall Ecological Value |
Low to Moderate
|
Moderate |
Table 7.15 Ecological
Evaluation of Channel
Criteria |
Channelized section of Shenzhen
River |
Other Channels within the Study
Area |
Naturalness |
Shenzhen
river channelized towards the western end of the Study Area and completely
modified by humans. Direct discharge
of domestic sewages from the households of Shenzhen is the main source of
pollution to the river section of the Project Site. |
Entirely
man-made habitat. |
Size |
Overall size of
approximately 1.7 ha (approximately 0.8 km).
|
Overall size of
7.4 ha (length of approximately 2.8 km).
|
Diversity |
Low floral and
faunal diversity. |
Low floral and
faunal diversity. |
Rarity |
No flora species
of conservation interest. Bird species
of conservation interest included Chinese Pond Heron (Ardeola bacchus) foraging,
Black-crowned Night Heron (Nycticorax
nycticorax) foraging, Grey Heron (Ardea
cinerea) foraging. |
No plant species
of conservation interest. Bird species of
conservation interest included Black Kite (Milvus migrans) flying overhead; Greater Spotted Eagle (Aquila clanga) flying overhead;
Bonelli's Eagle (Hieraaetus fasciatus)
flying overhead; Chinese Pond Heron (Ardeola
bacchus) foraging, Grey Heron (Ardea
cinerea) foraging Greater
Painted Snipe (Rostratula benghalensis)
in the vegetation within the channel, possibly part of a breeding colony. |
Re-creatability |
Habitat
characteristics and species composition are easy to recreate |
Habitat
characteristics and species composition are easy to recreate |
Fragmentation |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Ecological Linkage |
Not functionally
linked to any very highly valued habitat in close proximity. |
Not functionally
linked to any very highly valued habitat in close proximity. |
Potential Value |
Low. |
Low. |
Nursery/Breeding
Ground |
None. |
Possible breeding
ground for Greater Painted Snipe. |
Age |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Abundance /
Richness of Wildlife |
Moderate abundance / richness of fauna |
Moderate abundance / richness of fauna |
Overall Ecological Value |
Low |
Low (except Low to Moderate in |
Table 7.16 Ecological
Evaluation of Pond
Criteria |
Pond |
Naturalness |
Semi-natural
habitat, some partially controlled by humans.
|
Size |
Overall size of
approximately 0.5 ha. |
Diversity |
Low floral and
faunal diversity. |
Rarity |
No plant species
of conservation interest. Bird species
of conservation interest included Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) foraging; White-breasted Waterhen (Amaurornis
phoenicurus) foraging. |
Re-creatability |
Habitat
characteristics and species composition are easy to recreate. |
Fragmentation |
Highly fragmented. |
Ecological Linkage |
Not functionally
linked to any very highly valued habitat in close proximity. |
Potential Value |
Low. |
Nursery/Breeding
Ground |
None. |
Age |
Young (<10
years). |
Abundance /
Richness of Wildlife |
Low abundance / richness of fauna. |
Overall Ecological Value |
Low |
Table 7.17 Ecological
Evaluation of Developed Area
Criteria |
Developed Area |
Naturalness |
Man-made
habitat dominated by landscape plants and weed plants. |
Size |
Small patches
throughout the Study Area with an overall size of approximately 38.2 ha. |
Diversity |
Low to moderate
floral and low faunal diversity. |
Rarity |
No plant species of
conservation interest. Bird species of
conservation interest included Common Buzzard (Buteo buteo) both perching and flying
overhead; Crested Goshawk Accipiter
trivirgatus flying overhead; Emerald Dove (Chalcophaps indica) calling in the vicinity; Chinese
Pond Heron (Ardeola bacchus) flying
overhead; Little Egret (Egretta
garzetta) flying overhead. |
Re-creatability |
Habitat
characteristics and species composition are easy to recreate. |
Fragmentation |
Highly
fragmented. |
Ecological Linkage |
Not functionally
linked to any very highly valued habitat in close proximity. |
Potential Value |
Low. |
Nursery/Breeding
Ground |
None. |
Age |
Not
applicable. |
Abundance /
Richness of Wildlife |
Low abundance / richness of fauna |
Overall Ecological Value |
Low |
A list and evaluation of recently recorded key floral
and faunal species of ecological interest during ecological field update surveys
recorded within the Study Area, according to the EIAO-TM, are given in Table
7.18. The species of conservation
interest shown in Table 7.18 present
only those species recorded during the update ecological surveys but not the
species from the literature review which have been previously detailed in Section 7.5.
Table 7.18 Evaluation
of Floral and Faunal Species of Conservation Interest recorded within the Study
Area during the Ecological Surveys in both Dry and Wet Seasons (1)
Species |
Location and
Activities (if any) |
Protection Status |
Distribution |
Commonness in |
Plant |
||||
Incense Tree
Aquilaria sinensis |
Recorded in secondary woodland
to the south of Tsung Yuen Ha Village |
Protected under the Protection of Endangered Species of
Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap 586).
Category II protected plant in the List
of Wild Plants under State Protection in PRC. Near Threatened in PRC ([50]). Listed as “Vulnerable” in the |
Lowland forests and Fung
shui woods |
Common |
Mammal |
|
|
|
|
Small Indian Civet Viverricula indica |
Scats recorded along Ha Heung Yuen’s
trail by stream and abandoned agricultural land |
Protected under Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap
170). |
Widely distributed in forested
areas throughout Hong Kong, except |
Abundant |
Leopard Cat Prionailurus bengalensis |
Scats recorded along the
restricted boundary patrol road towards Gate 41, in the north of the Study
Area |
Class II Protected
Animal of PRC. Protected under Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap
170) and Protection of Endangered
Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap 586). Listed as “Vulnerable” in Appendix I of CITES |
Widely distributed in
forested areas throughout Hong Kong, except |
Uncommon |
East Asian / Malayan
Porcupine Hystrix brachyura |
Road-kill individual
recorded along the main road in the north of the Study Area |
Protected under Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap
170) |
Widespread throughout
most of Hong Kong, but no record found on |
Abundant |
Three unidentified bat
species |
At least three species
of bats recorded (based on their different sizes) near Gate 54 (north of
Tsung Yuen Ha) one evening, while on another evening, small unidentified bats
were seen flying around the village areas.
On a third evening, both small and large unidentified bats were
observed flying around Tsung Yuen Ha |
All bat species in |
Undetermined but some
species are widely distributed in forested areas throughout |
Unknown |
Bird |
|
NB All birds in |
|
|
Crested Serpent Eagle Spilornis cheela |
Recorded flying over
secondary woodland near Tsung Yuen Ha |
Class II Protected
Animal of PRC. Protected under Protection of Endangered Species of
Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586).
Listed as “Vulnerable” in |
Found in woodland area; |
Rare resident or passage
migrant in |
Besra Accipiter virgatus |
Recorded soaring above secondary
woodland/plantation in the south of the Study Area and perching in the
secondary woodland of Tsung Yuen Ha, which was considered a possible roosting
or nesting site |
Protected under Protection of Endangered Species of
Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586) |
Usually in woodland area
but can also be found in mangrove; |
Rare resident in |
Black Kite Milvus migrans |
Recorded soaring above
Ping Yuen channel and over the |
Class II Protected
Animal of PRC. Protected under Protection of Endangered Species of
Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586).
Appendix 2 of CITES |
Found in many types of
habitats; |
Common and widespread.
Resident and winter visitor in |
Common Buzzard Buteo buteo |
Recorded on multiple
occasions throughout the full range of the Study Area, both perching and
flying above |
Class II Protected
Animal of PRC. Protected under Protection of Endangered Species of
Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586).
Appendix 2 of CITES |
Found in many types of
habitats; Palaearctic, |
Uncommon passage migrant
or winter visitor in |
Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus |
Recorded soaring above
the Study Area over the stream north of Ta Kwu Ling village, hunting for
Feral Pigeon |
Class II Protected
Animal of PRC. Protected under Protection of Endangered Species of
Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586).
Appendix 1 of CITES |
Widely distributed in
many types of habitats in |
Rare resident or winter
visitor in |
Greater Spotted Eagle |
Recorded soaring above
the Ping Yuen channel in the south of the Study Area |
Class I Protected Animal
of PRC. Protected under Protection of Endangered Species of
Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586).
Listed as “Vulnerable” in IUCN Red List Status. Listed as “Rare” in |
Found in |
Rare winter visitor in |
Bonelli's Eagle Hieraaetus fasciatus |
Recorded soaring above
the Ping Yuen channel in the south of the Study Area |
Class II Protected
Animal of PRC. Protected under Protection of Endangered Species of
Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586).
Listed as “Rare” in |
Nest on rocky outcrops;
South Eurasia and |
Rare resident in |
Savanna Nightjar Caprimulgus affinis |
Recorded calling in the
dry abandoned agricultural land near Tsung Tuen Ha village within the Study
Area during night survey only.
Location shown is only estimate |
Uncommon but widely distributed
in |
|
Uncommon (but
potentially rare) resident and passage migrant in |
Emerald Dove Chalcophaps indica |
Recorded both over
developed area in the middle of the Study Area, as well as over shrubby grassland
in the north and on one occasion was displaying territorial behaviour,
indicating possible breeding |
Listed at “Vulnerable”
in |
Favours thick woodland
and good secondary growth. South Asia
and |
Rare and local resident
in |
Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis |
Recorded both roosting
and perching in low-lying grassland, cultivated land and abandoned
agricultural land in the Study Area, habitats that could constitute breeding
habitats |
Class II Protected
Animal of PRC. Listed as ”Vulnerable”
in |
Found in many types of
habitats in |
Common and widespread
resident in Very rare in |
Lesser Coucal Centropus bengalensis |
Mainly recorded towards the
north of the Study Area, with one sighting in the south. Sightings were mainly over abandoned
agricultural land and shrubby grassland, which similarly to the Greater
Coucal, could constitute possible breeding habitats |
Class II Protected
Animal of PRC. Listed as “Vulnerable”
in |
Found in shrubby area of
|
Uncommon resident in |
Asian Barred Owlet /
Cuckoo Owl Glaucidium cuculoides |
Recorded calling in the
Study Area during night surveys only. Locations
shown are only estimates |
Class II Protected
Animal of PRC. Protected under Protection of Endangered Species of
Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586) |
Widely distributed in
woodland throughout |
Rare resident in |
Japanese Sparrowhawk Accipiter gularis |
Recorded flying into
secondary woodland in the south of the Study Area, after being flushed from a
nearby perch |
Protected under Protection
of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586) |
Found in Chek Lap Kok,
Mai Po, Tsim Bei Tsui, Mong Tseng, Cheung Chau, Po Toi, Tung Ping Chau; Asia. |
Rare passage migrant and
winter visitor in |
Crested Goshawk Accipiter trivirgatus |
Recorded flying overhead
in the northern region of the Study Area
|
Class II Protected
Animal of PRC. Protected under Protection of Endangered Species of
Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586).
Listed as “Rare” in |
Widely distributed in
woodlands and shrublands throughout |
Locally uncommon
resident in |
Collared Crow Corvus torquatus |
Recorded in the secondary
woodland opposite to Chuk Yuen village, and the channel outside the Project
Site. |
Listed as
“Near-threatened” in IUCN Red List Status.
|
Usually recorded near
water and often feeds along the shore.
Found in |
Uncommon resident in |
Greater Painted Snipe Rostratula benghalensis |
Recorded among the
vegetation in the Ping Yuen channel in the south of the Study Area. Unclear from plumage whether birds were
adult males or juvenile males/females.
Greater Painted Snipe is a passage migrant in |
- |
Breeding colonies
recorded in |
Rare passage migrant,
winter visitor and occasional breeder in |
Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus |
Found foraging in
stream, abandoned agricultural land, channel, and marshy low-lying grassland
habitats and flying overhead in developed area in the Study Area; |
All ardeid species are considered of “potential regional concern”. |
Breeds at several
egretries in Hong Kong; |
Common and widespread
resident in |
Black-crowned Night
Heron Nycticorax nycticorax |
Found in stream and
channel habitats in the Study Area; foraging. |
All ardeid species are considered of “potential regional concern”. |
Several breeding
colonies known in |
Uncommon resident and
passage migrant in |
Grey Heron Ardea cinerea |
Found in stream, channel
and marshy low-lying grassland habitats in the Study Area; foraging. |
All ardeid species are considered of “potential regional concern”. |
In |
Uncommon resident and
passage migrant in |
Great Egret Casmerodius albus |
Found in stream habitat
in the Study Area; foraging. |
All ardeid species are considered of “potential regional concern”. |
Mainly in northern |
Common and widespread
resident and winter visitor in |
Intermediate Egret Egretta intermedia |
Found in stream habitat
in the Study Area; foraging. |
All ardeid species are considered of “potential regional concern”. |
Seen annually in |
Rare passage migrant,
winter and summer visitor to |
Little Egret Egretta garzetta |
Found foraging in
stream, pond and marshy low-lying grassland habitats and flying overhead in
developed area in the Study Area;. |
All ardeid species are considered of “potential regional concern”. |
Mostly in northern |
Common and widespread
resident and winter visitor to |
Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis |
Found foraging in cultivated
land habitat in the Study Area, but outside the Project Site. |
All ardeid species are considered of “potential regional concern”. |
Mostly confined to the
northern |
Common and widespread resident
and passage migrant in |
Little Green Heron Butorides striatus |
Found perching in
secondary woodland and foraging in stream habitat in the Study Area, but
outside the Project Site. |
All ardeid species are considered of “potential regional concern”. |
Wherever mangroves are
still found in Hong Kong; almost worldwide excluding |
Uncommon resident as
well as summer and winter visitor and passage migrant. |
Common Teal Anas crecca and |
Found foraging in the stream
habitat within the Project Site |
This species is considered of “regional concern”. |
Found in |
Common winter visitor. |
White-breasted Waterhen Amaurornis phoenicurus |
Found foraging in
stream, marshy low-lying grassland and pond habitats, and perching in
abandoned agricultural land within the Study Area. |
This species is considered of “regional concern”. |
Widely distributed in wetland
throughout Hong Kong; |
Common resident. |
Herpetofauna |
|
|
|
|
Chinese Bullfrog Hoplobatrachus chinensis |
Recorded along the small
stream of Ha Heung Yuen |
Class II Protected
Animal of PRC. |
Widespread throughout the
New Territories and |
Common |
Butterfly |
|
|
|
|
Courtesan Euripus nyctelius |
Recorded in the
low-lying grassland near the Shenzhen river just south of Chuk Yuen |
- |
First photographed in
HKSAR only in the summer of 2006 |
Rare |
Note: Based on
literature review, there are a number of wildlife species of conservation
interest including Small Asian Mongoose, Small Indian Civet, East Asian
Porcupine, Leopard Cat, Masked Palm Civet and Red Muntjac, Black Kite, Crested
Serpent Eagle, Hwamei and Greater Coucal recorded within the Study Area
(details refer to Section 7.5).
7.9
Project Site
Under the proposed Stage 4 regulation, about 4.5km of
the
The stream / river is the key habitat in the Project
Site and it is this, namely the
Low-lying grassland/ marshy low-lying grassland are
the major habitats of the Project Site and surrounds the river
on either side. It is dominated by the
perennial, native herbs, Burma-reed Neyraudia
reynaudiana and Matting grass Microstegium
vagans, which are regularly cut back by humans.
The Project Site overlaps with the edges of some
abandoned agricultural land west of Gate 56, east of Gate 55 and to a tiny
degree near Gate 54. It also covers a
larger patch of abandoned agricultural land near Chuk Yuen village. This habitat is overgrown and exotic plants
such as Banana plant Musa x paradisiaca
and Sweet Broomwort Scoparia dulcis
can be seen growing in high abundance.
The Project Site also overlaps with patches of
cultivated land. The cultivated land
borders both abandoned agricultural land and developed area.
There is some secondary woodland in the north-eastern
end of the Project Site. This small
patch of secondary woodland largely falls outside the Project Site and follows
the current boundary patrol road west, in an area of road only accessible via
boundary police controlled gates. It
extends north to a derelict old chicken farm (developed area) and is also
bordered by low-lying grassland and shrubby grassland. One of the bird species of conservation
interest, Common Buzzard, was recorded in this secondary woodland.
A tiny area of plantation can be found at the
north-eastern end of the Project Site, belonging to a small patch which
predominantly falls outside the Project Site.
Some channel habitat falls within the Project
Site. At the western-most edge of the
Project Site, a small section of the
Species of conservation interest recorded within the
Project Site included butterfly Courtesan, bird species Greater Coucal, Common
Buzzard, Black Kite flying overhead, Peregrine Falcon flying overhead, Chinese
Pond Heron, Black-crowned Night Heron, Grey Heron, Great Egret, Intermediate
Egret, Little Egret, Common Teal and White-breasted Waterhen. The ecological evaluation of the Project Site
is summarized in Table 7.19.
Table 7.19 Ecological Evaluation of Project Site
Criteria |
Project Site |
Naturalness |
Overall, only moderately
natural. Secondary woodland is
natural and largely protected from human disturbance by merit of falling
within a boundary police controlled region. Low-lying grassland/ marshy low-lying grassland
are frequently modified by humans, cutting back the main vegetation and are
therefore disturbed. Channel, plantation,
abandoned-agricultural land, cultivated land and developed area are man-made
habitats/intensively modified by humans.
The |
Size |
Within the HKSAR boundary, the total size is about
24.3 ha of which approximately 1.9 ha (3.6 km) of stream / river, 6.3 ha of
low-lying grassland, 5.9 ha of marshy low-lying grassland, 4 ha of developed
area (including road / path), 3.3 ha of abandoned agricultural land, 1.9 ha
of cultivated land, 0.4 ha of secondary woodland, 0.6 ha (0.2 km) of channel
and 0.03 ha of plantation. |
Diversity |
Overall low to moderate
floral and faunal diversity. |
Rarity |
Species of conservation interest recorded included
butterfly Courtesan, bird
species (Greater Coucal, Common Buzzard, Black Kite flying overhead,
Peregrine Falcon flying overhead, Chinese Pond Heron, Black-crowned Night
Heron, Grey Heron, Great Egret, Intermediate Egret, Little Egret, Common Teal
and White-breasted Waterhen). |
Re-creatability |
It would take about 30
years for the secondary woodland to be re-created; plantation is easy to
recreate but would take about 10 years to re-create. Low-lying grassland would take
approximately 1-2 years to re-create.
Abandoned agricultural land may take to up to 2 years to
re-create. Stream / river is difficult
to re-create. Cultivated land, channel
and developed area are readily and immediately re-creatable. |
Fragmentation |
Not fragmented.
|
Ecological linkage |
Not functionally linked to
any very highly valued habitat in close proximity. |
Potential value |
Moderate. |
Nursery/breeding ground |
Stream / river is potential breeding ground for
odonates. |
Age |
Overall the Project Site is possibly over 20 years
old. Stream / river is possibly over
50 years old, secondary woodland is about 20-30years old, plantation is
10-20years old, and the area has been being cultivated for many years
(cultivated land and abandoned agricultural land). Channel is more recent (5-10years), as is
the low-lying grassland, with the boundary patrol road being approximately 25
years old (developed area). |
Abundance/Richness of wildlife |
Abundance of terrestrial and aquatic fauna was low |
Overall
Ecological Importance |
Low to Moderate |
7.10
Terrestrial Ecological Impact Assessment and
Evaluation
The potential impacts due to the
construction and operation of the Project, are identified and assessed
(following the EIAO-TM Annex 16
guidelines) in Sections 7.10.1 and 7.10.2, and the impacts evaluated (based
on the criteria in EIAO-TM Annex 8)
in Section 7.10.3.
7.10.1
Potential Sources of Impact
Construction Phase
Construction phase activities are divided into two
main components, ‘advanced works’ and ‘river modification & associated
works’. The works activities that may
cause ecological impacts including loss of habitat, habitat fragmentation and
isolation, changes in water quality and hydrodynamic properties, potential
impacts on species of conservation interest, noise and other disturbance
generated by the construction activities etc, are discussed below:
For the advanced works, on the HKSAR side of the
Study Area about 4.5km of the boundary patrol road will be reprovisioned. It will be paved with concrete and will be 3.5m
wide, with passing bays (12m long and 6m wide) every 200-300m. Boundary fences will be constructed on both
sides of the boundary patrol road. The
height of the secondary and primary boundary fences will be 3.5m and 4.6m
respectively and the primary fence will be equipped with a security sensing
system and barbed wire.
Within the HKSAR, the ‘river modification and
associated works’ phase of activities will include river sediment and soil
excavation for river widening, embankment works, as well as a new bridge at Luo
Fang. Three main channelization methods
will be used for the river widening: compound channel design, trapezoid channel
design and vertical channel design with compound channel design being used in
most of the river section (See Section 3 for
details). Cofferdams, built for the
river widening, will also have to be demolished after river widening has been
completed.
In addition, a flood retardation pond is proposed on
the Shenzhen side of the river. It will
cover an area of approximately 22,000m2 and have a storage capacity
of 80,000 m3. Overflow weirs
will be used in the inlet and outlet of the retardation pond.
Operation Phase
During the operational phase, water is expected to
flow through the newly channelised river and therefore changes in hydrodynamic
properties and hydrology may occur.
Boundary control along the boundary patrol road is not expected to
change after the advanced works, nor is public use of those boundary roads that
are accessible to the public. Noise and
other disturbance generated by the operation activities are expected to be
similar to the current operation.
Maintenance dredging of the river channel will take place when
necessary.
The construction and operation phase activities that
may cause ecological impacts including loss of habitat and other disturbances,
are assessed below following the EIAO-TM
Annex 16 guidelines.
7.10.2
Assessment of Ecological Impacts
Construction Phase – Advanced Works
Habitat Loss
Within the HKSAR boundary, there will be permanent
loss of low-lying grassland (approximately 4.1 ha), marshy low-lying grassland
(approximately 2.9 ha), developed area (approximately 3.5 ha), abandoned
agricultural land (approximately 3.3 ha), cultivated land (approximately 1.9
ha), stream / river (approximately 0.3 ha), channel (approximately 0.05 ha) and
plantation (approximately 0.03 ha) (see Table
7.20). Approximately 0.4 ha of the
secondary woodland which was located within the works area may be disturbed
during the construction phase (such loss is considered as the worst case
scenario for the purpose of the assessment and the Project will preserve/avoid
such habitat as far as possible; it will be reinstated after construction if
this small patch of woodland could not be avoided due to the project works),
but additional secondary woodland habitat (~0.5 ha) will be formed after the
Advanced Works. No fish ponds, wet
agricultural land or marshes will be directly affected by the advanced works.
Table 7.20 Overall
Habitat Loss due to the Advanced Works and River Modification & Associated
Works
Impacted
Habitat |
Habitat
Loss during Construction due to Advanced Works (ha) |
Reinstatement
Habitats after Completion of Advanced Works (ha) |
Habitat
Loss during Construction due to the River Modification & Associated
Works (ha) |
Reinstatement
Habitats after Completion of River Modification & Associated Works (ha) |
Total
Permanent Loss due to the Project (ha) |
Ecological
Importance of the Affected Habitat |
Total
Area of said Habitat within the Study Area (ha) |
Low-lying grassland |
~4.1 |
0 |
~2.2 |
0 |
~6.3 |
Low |
~11.3 |
Marshy low-lying grassland |
~2.9 |
0 |
~3.0 |
~1.9 (a) |
~4 ha Additional ~4.1 ha of Riverbank Landscaping Areas
will be provided (b) |
Low to moderate |
~6.6 |
Stream / river |
~0.3 (0.9 km) |
0 |
~1.6 ha (2.8 km) |
~1.6 ha (c) |
~0.3 ha Additional ~2.1 ha stream/ river habitat will be
formed (c) |
Low to moderate |
~2.8 (6.0 km) |
Abandoned agricultural land |
~3.3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
~3.3 |
Low to moderate |
~82.5 |
Developed area (including road / path) |
~3.5 |
0 |
~0.5 |
0 |
~4.0 |
Low |
~38.2 |
Channel |
~0.05 (0.03 km) |
0 |
~0.6 (0.2 km) |
0 |
~0.65 (0.23 km) |
Low |
~9.1 (3.6 km) |
Cultivated land |
~1.9 |
0 |
~0.04 |
0 |
~1.94 |
Low |
~56.8 |
Secondary |
~0.4 ha (d) |
~0.4 ha (d) |
0 |
0 |
Additional ~0.5 ha secondary woodland will be
formed (d) |
Moderate |
~18.0 |
|
~0.03 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
~0.03 |
Low to moderate |
~3.1 |
Note: (a) Approximately 1.9 ha of the marshy low-lying
grassland will be reinstated at three flood plain areas (location refer to Figures 3.3-3.4) after river modification. (b) Further details refer to Section 7.11.3. (c) Approximately 1.6 ha of the Shenzhen River will
be disturbed due to River Modification & Associated Work during
construction (which will be reinstated after river modification) and
approximately 0.3 ha will be lost due to Advanced Works, but Shenzhen River
will be widened after the river modification works and therefore additional
stream/river habitat with natural bottom (~2.1 ha) will expect to be
formed. (d) For the purpose of assessment, a worst case
scenario in which approximately 0.4 ha of the secondary woodland will be
disturbed due to Advanced Works during construction has been adopted. The habitat will be reinstated after
construction) and additional secondary woodland habitat (~0.5 ha) will be
formed after the Advanced Works. |
Habitat Fragmentation and Isolation
Habitat fragmentation and isolation is expected to be
low as there are existing boundary patrol road and security fences running along
the boundary, and the alignment and the design of the new boundary patrol road
and boundary fences will be similar to the existing road and fences, except
that the future patrol road will have security fences on both sides while the
existing patrol road only have security fence on one side.
Impacts to Wildlife in particular Species
of Conservation Interest
In view of the generally poor habitat quality of the
site, it is believed that the Project Site does not provide optimal habitats
for most of the recorded species of conservation interest as listed in Table 7.18. The confirmed species of conservation interest recorded within the
advanced works area during the ecological surveys included Common Buzzard,
ardeid species including Chinese Pond Heron, Black-crowned
Night Heron, Grey Heron, Great Egret, Intermediate Egret and Little Egret, and
two wetland dependent bird species including Common Teal and White-breasted Waterhen. Although some mammal and bird species of
conservation interest including Small Asian Mongoose, Small Indian Civet, East
Asian Porcupine, Leopard Cat, Masked Palm Civet and Red Muntjac, Black Kite,
Crested Serpent Eagle, Greater Coucal,
Lesser Coucal Hwamei, and Yellow-breasted Bunting, were recorded within the Study Area from
the literature review, locations of such species were often not precisely
defined and most of these were recorded in the woodland near Chuk Yuen, or in
the agricultural areas in villages (Tsung Yuen Ha and Heung Yuen Wai). A Coutesan butterfly was also recorded in the
advanced works area in low lying grassland by
Table 7.21 Impacts
on Species of Conservation Interests due to the Advanced Works Area and River
Modification & Associated Work
Species
of Conservation Interest |
Impact |
Location |
|
Mammal |
|
|
|
East Asian / Malayan Porcupine, Leopard
Cat, Small Indian Civet; Small Asian Mongoose, Masked Palm Civet, Red Muntjac
and unidentified
bat species |
Although the Project Site
may form part of their associated habitat used for foraging; there are
extensive shrubby grassland and secondary woodland habitats in
proximity. Impact is expected to be
low and acceptable. |
All recorded outside the Project Site (refer to Sections 7.5.2 & 7.7.2) |
|
Bird |
|
|
|
Common Buzzard |
Although part of their associated
habitat used for perching/ foraging will be affected; there are extensive
shrubby grassland and secondary woodland habitats in proximity. Impact is expected to be low and
acceptable. |
Found in many types of
habitats in |
|
Greater Coucal |
Although part of their
associated habitat used for perching/ foraging will be affected; there are
extensive shrubby grassland and secondary woodland habitats in
proximity. Impact is expected to be
low and acceptable. |
Found in many types of
habitats in |
|
Black Kite |
Although part of their
associated habitat used for foraging will be affected; there are extensive
shrubby grassland and secondary woodland habitats in proximity. Impact is expected to be low and
acceptable. |
Found in many types of
habitats in |
|
Peregrine Falcon |
Although part of their
associated habitat used for foraging will be affected; there are extensive
shrubby grassland and secondary woodland habitats in proximity. Impact is expected to be low and
acceptable. |
Found in many types of
habitats in |
|
Crested Serpent Eagle, Lesser Coucal and Hwamei |
Although the Project Site
may form part of their associated habitat used for perching/ foraging; there
are extensive shrubby grassland and secondary woodland habitats in
proximity. Impact is expected to be low
and acceptable. |
Usually prefer woodland or shrubby areas in |
|
Ardeid species including Chinese Pond Heron, Black-crowned
Night Heron, Grey Heron, Great Egret, Intermediate Egret and Little Egret,
two wetland dependent bird species of conservation interest Common Teal and
White-breasted Waterhen, and Yellow-breasted Bunting |
Although the Project Site
may form part of their associated habitat used for perching/ foraging; there
are extensive similar habitats, ie stream, channel, agricultural lands
(active/ abandoned), ponds in proximity.
In addition, the construction works will be temporary and relatively
small scale. Impact is expected to be
low to moderate and acceptable. There
will also be reprovision of similar habitats in operation phase and therefore
the potential impacts expect to be further minimised. |
Found in many types of
wetland habitats in |
|
Herpetofauna |
|
|
|
Chinese Bullfrog |
Since this species recorded
outside the Project Site, potential impact on this species is not expected to
be anticipated. |
Recorded in
agricultural land and along
the small stream of Ha Heung Yuen and outside the Project Site (refer to Sections 7.5.4 & 7.7.4) |
|
Burmese Python |
Since this species
recorded outside the Project Site, potential impact on this species is not
expected to be anticipated. |
Recorded in
agricultural land near |
|
Butterfly |
|
|
|
Courtesan |
Part of their associated
habitat used for perching/ foraging will be affected but there are extensive
hillside shrubby grasslands in proximity.
Although its larval food
plants were recorded in the low-lying grassland (also recorded in various
habitats within the Study Area), this habitat was considered not their major
habitat. This is because the habitat
could be flooded during the wet season. Impact is expected to be
low and acceptable. |
The species has the habit of hill-topping, so is usually
limited to hilly areas and highlands.
Recorded in the low-lying grassland near the Shenzhen river just south
of Chuk Yuen during the surveys. |
|
Small Three-ring and Spotted Angle |
Both recorded in Tsung Yuen Ha
(mainly agricultural areas) but outside the Project Site.
Although the Project Site may form part of their associated habitat
used for foraging; there are extensive similar habitats in proximity. Impact is expected to be low and
acceptable. |
Both recorded outside the Project Site (refer to Sections 7.5.5 & 7.7.6) |
|
Odonate |
|
|
|
Tawny Hooktail |
Recorded in |
Recorded outside the
Project Site (refer to Sections 7.7.5 |
|
Impacts on Water Quality
The advanced works will take place prior to the river
modification. Construction site run-off
into the
Impacts to Recognized Sites of
Conservation Importance downstream of the Study Area along the
There will be no direct impacts to receptor sites further downstream
from the Study Area along the
Noise, Dust and Other Disturbance
Generated by the Advanced Works’ Construction Activities
Secondary impacts to the surrounding habitats and wildlife groups may
arise from the increased noise impact, dust generation, human activities and
disturbance. The construction works will
be implemented by phase so that disturbance could be minimised. The impacts are expected to be low to
moderate owing to the temporary nature and relatively small scale of the
construction works. With the
implementation of environmental management measures and regular checks on construction
boundaries, the potential impacts are expected to be further minimised.
Construction Phase - River Modification & Associated Works
Habitat Loss
Within the HKSAR boundary, low-lying grassland
(approximately 2.2 ha), developed area (approximately 0.5 ha), channel (approximately
0.6 ha) and cultivated land (approximately 0.04 ha) will be directly affected
due to the river modification (see Table
7.20). The stream / river
(approximately 1.6 ha) habitat will be disturbed during construction. Most of the affected habitats will be
converted to stream/river habitat (approximately 4 ha) after river modification
works, with result of net increase of approximately 2.4 ha of stream / river
habitat (noted that there will be permanent loss of approximately 0.3 ha of
stream / river habitat due to Advanced Works).
No fish ponds, wet agricultural land or marshes will be directly
affected by the river modification and associated works. However loss of approximately 3 ha of marshy
low-lying grassland (in which ~1.9 ha will be reinstated at three flood plain
areas, location refer to Figure
3.3-3.4), is noted as during heavy storms this habitat near the river
could flood and become marshy.
Habitat Fragmentation and Isolation
The Shenzhen River will be widened and deepened under
the river modification and associated works phase, however since the existing
meandering profile of the river will be maintained as far as possible, no new
habitats will be fragmented. With regard
to habitat isolation, although the habitats across the river from each other
will become further apart, design and landscaping of the new
Impacts to Wildlife in particular Species of
Conservation Interest
In view of the generally poor habitat quality of the
site, it is believed that the Project Site does not provide optimal habitats
for most of the recorded species of conservation interest as listed in Table 7.18. Confirmed species of conservation interest recorded within the
river modification and associated works area included one butterfly Courtesan
and six birds, the Common Buzzard and Greater Coucal in low-lying grassland,
Black Kite and Peregrine Falcon flying overhead, Common Teal in stream and
White-breasted Waterhen in marshy low-lying grassland. Potential impacts on species of conservation interest
recorded during literature review and surveys are summarized in Table 7.21.
Impacts on Water Quality
Construction of the river modification will be
carried out in phases. Water will be
diverted before the commencement of soil excavation and construction works in a
particular phase. Excavation for river
modification and flood retardation pond (at Shenzhen side of the river) will be
both wet excavation and dry excavation and the excavated spoils will be
transported by dump trucks and temporary stored at the stockpiling area within
the Project Site. Since the water of the
Change in Hydrology
Both sides of the central line of the designated
river course of a particular phase will be excavated first and the river course
along the central line will be kept as a ‘diversion dyke’. When the excavation and placement of the
embankment foundation are carried out on one side, the river course on the
other side will be used as a diversion channel.
A longitudinal cofferdam will be built at the centre of the designated
river course and additional cofferdams will be built across the river in 200 to
300m intervals in designed river course to meet the need of construction. At the end of this phase of construction
works, the cofferdams will be demolished.
Given the consideration of providing diversion dyke/channel as the
Project working method and the temporary nature of the construction works,
impact on the change in hydrology is therefore not anticipated.
Impact to Recognized Sites of Conservation
Importance downstream of the Study Area along the
Secondary impacts to receptor
sites further downstream from the Study Area along the Shenzhen River, such as
the Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site and Mai Po Marshes, Inner Deep Bay SSSI, Wetland Conservation Area and Wetland
Buffer Area may arise should water in the
Shenzhen River become polluted with construction run-off or excavated spoils, and the actual impact will subject to the
construction practice. Given good
construction practice, implementation of appropriate run-off measures and the
distance of these sites from the Study Area (over 8 km), this is not considered
a significant impact. In fact the water quality modelling
results suggest that changes to the water quality around the
Noise, Dust and Other Disturbance Generated by the
River Modification & Associated Works’ Construction Activities
Secondary impacts to the surrounding habitats and wildlife groups may arise
from the increased noise impact, dust generation, human activities and
disturbance. The construction works will
be implemented by phase so that disturbance could be minimised. The impacts are expected to be low to
moderate owing to the temporary nature and relatively small scale of the
construction works. Regular checks on
construction boundaries will be conducted along with implementation of
environmental management measures.
Operation Phase
Maintenance Dredging of the
The frequency and scale of maintenance dredging
required along the river channel and the flood retardation pond is anticipated
to be very small compared with the dredging works during the capital works. Given the
scale and volume of dredging, it is not anticipated that there will be adverse
impact to the water quality of
Changes in Water Quality and Hydrodynamics
The water
quality modelling results (Section 6) suggest that overall there will be no unacceptable water quality impacts from
operation of the Project.
With
regard to hydrodynamics, the results of
the water modelling results
suggest the Project will be beneficial to the hydrodynamics of the Project Site
by improving the flood prevention performance (see Section
6).
However,
due to tidal influence from
Therefore,
operation of the Project is not expected to significantly affect the
hydrodynamic conditions or sediment deposition downstream of the Project Site
and hence adverse impacts to the sensitive receptors near the Shenzhen River
mouth, including Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site, Mai Po Marshes SSSI, Inner
Deep Bay SSSI, Wetland Conservation Area and Wetland Buffer Area, are not
anticipated.
Noise
and Other Disturbance Generated by the Operation Activities
Boundary
control along the boundary patrol road is not expected to change after the
completion of the advanced works, nor is public use of those boundary patrol
roads that are accessible to the public.
Noise and other disturbance generated by the operation activities are
expected to be similar to the current operation, and therefore no unacceptable
impact will expect to be anticipated. In addition, no indirect impacts on habitat
or wildlife groups are anticipated.
Impact to Recognized Sites of Conservation
Importance downstream of the Study Area along the
As described
previously, changes in hydrodynamics, water quality caused by the Project, as
well as maintenance dredging carried out during operation phase of the Project
are not expected to have any adverse impacts on receptor sites further
downstream from the Project Site along the Shenzhen River, such as the Mai Po
Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site and Mai Po Marshes and Inner Deep Bay SSSI etc.
7.10.3
Impact Evaluation
Impacts identified and assessed in Section 7.10.2 are further evaluated in
this section, based on the criteria in EIAO-TM
Annex 8.
Construction Phase – Advanced Works & River Modification &
Associated Works
Habitat Loss
As detailed in Tabel
7.19 various habitats will be directly affected by the construction phase of
the Project, and the evaluation of the permanent habitat loss for each habitat
is presented below.
Low-lying Grassland
There will be permanent habitat loss of approximately 4.1 ha of
low-lying grassland due to the river modification & associated works and
2.2 ha due to the advanced works within the HKSAR boundary. Overall the impact of both phases of
construction on this habitat is considered to be low (see Table 7.22)
Table 7.22 Overall
Unmitigated Impact Evaluation for Low-lying Grassland due to the Advanced Works
and River Modification & Associated Works
Evaluation
Criteria |
Advanced Works |
River Modification & Associated Works |
Habitat Quality |
Low. |
Low. |
Species of Conservation
Interest |
Bird species of
conservation interest that are potentially affected (due to the loss of
associated habitat [ie perching/ foraging]) include Common Buzzard. Other wildlife
species of conservation interest that may use the areas are presented in Table 7.21. The impacts are
expected to be low due to the abundance of similar habitat in the surrounding
area. |
Bird species of
conservation interest that are potentially affected (due to the loss of
associated habitat [ie perching/ foraging]) include Common Buzzard and Greater Coucal. Other
wildlife species of conservation interest that may use areas are presented in
Table 7.21. The impacts are expected to be low
due to the abundance of similar habitat in the surrounding area. |
Size/Abundance |
Permanent loss of approximately 4.1 ha of low-lying grassland of a
total 11.3 ha within the whole |
Permanent loss of approximately 2.2 ha of low-lying grassland of a
total 11.3 ha within the whole |
Duration |
The impact will
persist during the construction and operational phases. |
The impact will
persist during the construction and operational phases. |
Reversibility |
The low-lying grassland can be re-created
in approximately 1-2 years. |
The low-lying grassland can be
re-created in approximately 1-2 years.
|
Magnitude |
The scale of
the habitat loss and impact is moderate – it constitutes approximately 36% of
this habitat type within the whole Study Area. |
The scale of
the habitat loss and impact is moderate – it constitutes approximately 20% of
this habitat type within the whole Study Area. |
Overall
Unmitigated Impact Conclusion |
Low |
Low |
Marshy Low-lying Grassland
There will be permanent habitat loss of approximately 3.0 ha of marshy
low-lying grassland due to the river modification & associated works and
2.9 ha due to the advanced works within the HKSAR boundary. Overall the impact of both phases of
construction on this habitat is considered to be low to moderate (see Table 7.23)
Table 7.23 Overall
Unmitigated Impact Evaluation for Marshy Low-lying Grassland due to the
Advanced Works and River Modification & Associated Works
Evaluation
Criteria |
Advanced Works |
River Modification & Associated Works |
Habitat Quality |
Low to moderate. |
Low to moderate. |
Species of Conservation
Interest |
Bird species of conservation
interest that are potentially affected (due to the loss of associated habitat
[ie perching/ foraging]) include Common
Buzzard and Chinese Pond Heron. Other
wildlife species of conservation interest that may use the areas are
presented in Table 7.21. These
species are common and widespread in |
Bird species of
conservation interest that are potentially affected (due to the loss of
associated habitat [ie perching/ foraging]) include Common Buzzard, White-breasted Waterhen, Greater Coucal Chinese Pond
Heron and Little Egret. Other wildlife species of conservation
interest that may use areas are presented in Table 7.21. The
impacts are expected to be low due to the abundance of other suitable
habitats in the surrounding area. In addition, the construction works will be
temporary and relatively small scale. |
Size/Abundance |
Permanent loss of approximately 2.9 ha of low-lying grassland of a
total 6.6 ha within the whole |
Approximately 3.0 ha of low-lying grassland of a total 6.6 ha within
the whole |
Duration |
The impact will
persist during the construction and operational phases. |
The impact will
persist during the construction and operational phases. |
Reversibility |
The low-lying grassland can be
re-created in approximately 1-2 years.
|
The low-lying grassland can be
re-created in approximately 1-2 years.
|
Magnitude |
The scale of
the habitat loss and impact is moderate – it constitutes approximately 44% of
this habitat type within the whole Study Area. |
The scale of
the habitat loss and impact is moderate – it constitutes approximately 45% of
this habitat type within the whole Study Area. |
Overall
Unmitigated Impact Conclusion |
Low to Moderate |
Low to Moderate |
Stream / River
Approximately 1.6 ha (2.8 km) of stream / river all from the
Table 7.24 Overall
Unmitigated Impact Evaluation for Stream / River due to the Advanced Works and
River Modification & Associated Works
Evaluation
Criteria |
Advanced Works |
River Modification & Associated Works |
Habitat Quality |
Low to
moderate. |
Low to
moderate. |
Species of Conservation
Interest |
Bird species of
conservation interest that are potentially affected (due to the loss of
associated habitat) include Chinese Pond Heron. Other
wildlife species of conservation interest that may use the areas are
presented in Table 7.21. The impacts are expected to be low
due to the abundance of similar habitat in the surrounding area. |
Bird species of
conservation interest that are potentially affected (due to the loss of
associated habitat) include Peregrine Falcon, Black Kite, Common Teal, Chinese Pond Heron, Black-crowned
Night Heron, Grey Heron, Great Egret, Intermediate Egret and Little Egret. These birds were recorded flying overhead
and are highly mobile. The impacts are
expected to be low due to the abundance of similar habitat in the surrounding
area and the mobility of the birds. Other wildlife species of conservation
interest that may use the areas are presented in Table 7.21. The
impacts are expected to be low due to the abundance of similar habitat in the
surrounding area. |
Size/Abundance |
Permanent loss of approximately 0.3 ha (0.9 km) of stream / river all
from the |
No permanent loss but with net gain of approximately 2.4 ha of stream
habitats. Approximately 1.6 ha (2.8
km) of stream / river all from the Shenzhen River will be disturbed during
construction and Shenzhen
River will be widened after the river modification works and therefore approximately 4 ha of stream/river habitat with natural bottom
will expect to be formed. The Study Area
contains 2.8 ha (6.0 km) of stream / river.
|
Duration |
The impact will
persist during the construction and operational phases. |
The impact will
persist mainly during the construction phases. |
Reversibility |
The stream /
river is difficult to recreate. |
The stream /
river is disturbed during construction.
|
Magnitude |
The scale of
the habitat loss and impact is low – it constitutes approximately 10% of this
habitat type by area and 3% by length within the whole Study Area. |
The total size
of stream/river habitat will be increased to 4 ha after river modification
although approximately 1.6 ha of the habitat will be disturbed during
construction. |
Overall
Unmitigated Impact Conclusion |
Low |
Low |
Abandoned Agricultural Land
There will be permanent habitat loss of approximately 3.3 ha due to the
advanced works area within the HKSAR boundary.
Overall the impact from the construction work on this habitat is
considered to be low (see Table 7.25)
Table 7.25 Overall
Unmitigated Impact Evaluation for Abandoned Agricultural Land due to the
Advanced Works
Evaluation
Criteria |
Advanced Works
|
Habitat Quality |
Low to
moderate. |
Species of Conservation Interest |
Bird species of conservation interest that are
potentially affected (due to the loss of associated habitat) include Chinese
Pond Heron. Other
wildlife species of conservation interest that may use the areas are
presented in Table 7.21. The impacts are expected to be low due to the
abundance of similar habitat in the surrounding area. |
Size/Abundance |
Permanent loss of approximately 3.3
ha of abandoned agricultural land of a total 82.9 ha within the whole |
Duration |
The impact will persist during the construction and
operational phases. |
Reversibility |
Abandoned agricultural land can be re-created. It
may take approximately 1-2 years to mature.
|
Magnitude |
The scale of
the habitat loss and impact is low – it constitutes approximately 3% of this
habitat type within the whole Study Area.
|
Overall
Unmitigated Impact Conclusion |
Low |
Developed Area
There will be permanent habitat loss of approximately 0.5 ha of
developed area due to the river modification & associated works and 3.5 ha
due to the advanced works area within the HKSAR boundary. Overall the impact from both phases of the
construction work on this habitat is considered to be low (see Table 7.26).
Table 7.26 Overall
Unmitigated Impact Evaluation for Developed Area due to the Advanced Works and
River Modification & Associated Works
Evaluation
Criteria |
Advanced Works |
River Modification &
Associated Work |
Habitat Quality |
Low. |
Low. |
Species of Conservation
Interest |
None recorded
during the surveys. Other wildlife species of conservation interest that may use the
areas are presented in Table 7.21. The impacts are expected to be low due to the
abundance of similar habitat in the surrounding area. |
None recorded
during the surveys. Other wildlife species of conservation interest that may use the
areas are presented in Table 7.21. The impacts are expected to be low due to the
abundance of similar habitat in the surrounding area. |
Size/Abundance |
Permanent loss of approximately 3.5 ha of developed area (including
road / path) of a total 38.2 ha within the whole |
Permanent loss of approximately 0.5 ha of developed area (including
road / path) of a total 38.2 ha within the whole |
Duration |
The impact will
persist during the construction and operational phases. |
The impact will
persist during the construction and operational phases. |
Reversibility |
Developed area
can be readily and immediately re-created.
|
Developed area
can be readily and immediately re-created.
|
Magnitude |
The scale of
the habitat loss and impact is low – it constitutes approximately 7.5% of
this habitat type within the whole Study Area. |
The scale of the
habitat loss and impact is low – it constitutes approximately 3% of this
habitat type within the whole Study Area.
|
Overall
Unmitigated Impact Conclusion |
Low |
Low |
Channel
There will be permanent habitat loss of approximately 0.6 ha (0.2 km)
of channel due to the river modification & associated works and 0.05 ha
(0.03 km) due to the advanced works area within the HKSAR boundary. Overall the impact from both phases of the construction
work on this habitat is considered to be low (see Table 7.27).
Table 7.27 Overall
Unmitigated Impact Evaluation for Channel due to the Advanced Works and River
Modification & Associated Works
Evaluation
Criteria |
Advanced Works |
River Modification &
Associated Work |
Habitat Quality |
Low |
Low |
Species of Conservation
Interest |
Bird species of
conservation interest that are potentially affected (due to the loss of
associated habitat) include Chinese Pond Heron. Other
wildlife species of conservation interest that may use the areas are
presented in Table 7.21. The impacts are expected to be low
due to the abundance of similar habitat in the surrounding area. |
Bird species of
conservation interest that are potentially affected (due to the loss of
associated habitat) include Chinese Pond Heron, Black-crowned Night Heron and Grey Heron. Other wildlife species of
conservation interest that may use the areas are presented in Table 7.21. The impacts are expected to be low due to the
abundance of similar habitat in the surrounding area. |
Size/Abundance |
Permanent loss of approximately 0.05 ha (0.03 km) of channel. The Study Area contains 9.2 ha (3.6km) of
channel. |
Permanent loss of approximately 0.6 ha (0.2km) of channel. The Study Area contains 9.2 ha (3.6 km) of
channel. |
Duration |
The impact will
persist during the construction and operational phases. |
The impact will
persist during the construction and operational phases. |
Reversibility |
Channel can be
readily and immediately re-created.
The current project will create much more of this habitat. |
Channel can be
readily and immediately re-created.
The current project will create much more of this habitat. |
Magnitude |
The scale of
the habitat loss and impact is low – it constitutes < 1% of this habitat
type by area and < 1% by length within the whole Study Area. |
The scale of
the habitat loss and impact is low – it constitutes 6.5% of this habitat type
by area and 3% by length within the whole Study Area. |
Overall
Unmitigated Impact Conclusion |
Low |
Low |
Cultivated Land
There will be permanent habitat loss of approximately 0.04 ha of
cultivated land due to the river modification & associated works and 1.9 ha
due to the advanced works area within the HKSAR boundary. Overall the impact from both phases of the
construction work on this habitat is considered to be low (see Table 7.28).
Table 7.28 Overall
Unmitigated Impact Evaluation for Cultivated Land (Dry) due to the Advanced
Works and River Modification & Associated Works
Evaluation
Criteria |
Advanced
Works |
River
Modification & Associated Work |
Habitat Quality |
Low. |
Low. |
Species of Conservation
Interest |
None recorded during the
surveys. Other wildlife species of conservation
interest that may use the areas are presented in Table 7.21. The impacts
are expected to be low due to the abundance of similar habitat in the
surrounding area. |
None recorded during the
surveys. Other wildlife species of
conservation interest that may use the areas are presented in Table 7.21. The impacts are expected to be low due to
the abundance of similar habitat in the surrounding area. |
Size/Abundance |
Permanent loss of approximately
1.9 ha of cultivated land of a total 56.9 ha within the whole |
Permanent loss of
approximately 0.04 ha of cultivated land of a total 56.9 ha within the whole
|
Duration |
The impact will persist
during the construction and operational phases. |
The impact will persist
during the construction and operational phases. |
Reversibility |
Cultivated land can be
readily and immediately re-created. |
Cultivated land can be
readily and immediately re-created. |
Magnitude |
The scale of the habitat
loss and impact is low – it constitutes approximately 3% of this habitat
type within the whole Study Area. |
The scale of the habitat
loss and impact is negligible – it constitutes <0.1 % of this habitat
type within the whole Study Area. |
Overall
Unmitigated Impact Conclusion |
Low |
Low |
Secondary
There will be no permanent habitat loss of secondary woodland due to
the river modification and associated works and the advanced works area within
the HKSAR boundary. Impact on the loss
of secondary woodland would be avoided and minimised as far as possible during
the construction phase. Approximately 0.4 ha of the secondary
woodland will be disturbed during construction (which will be reinstated after
construction), but additional secondary woodland habitat (~0.5 ha) will be
provided after the Advanced Works. The overall unmitigated impact from the advanced works
phase of the construction work on this habitat is considered to be low to
moderate (see Table 7.29).
Table 7.29 Overall
Unmitigated Impact Evaluation for Secondary
Evaluation
Criteria |
Advanced Works |
Habitat Quality |
Moderate. |
Species of Conservation Interest |
None recorded during the
surveys. Other
wildlife species of conservation interest that may use the areas are
presented in Table 7.21. The impacts are expected to be low due to the abundance
of similar habitat in the surrounding area.
|
Size/Abundance |
No permanent loss of secondary woodland of a total 20.4 ha within the whole |
Duration |
The impact will
persist during the construction and operational phases. |
Reversibility |
Secondary
woodland is difficult to re-create and would take approximately 30 years to
re-create. |
Magnitude |
The scale of
the habitat loss and impact is low – it constitutes < 2% of this habitat
type within the whole Study Area. |
Overall
Unmitigated Impact Conclusion |
Low to Moderate |
There will be no permanent habitat loss of plantation due to the river
modification and associated works and permanent habitat loss of approximately
0.03 ha due to the advanced works area within the HKSAR boundary. The impact is expected to be mitigated
through the provision of higher quality compensatory woodland. The overall impact from the advanced works
phase of the construction work on this habitat is considered to be low (see Table 7.30).
Table 7.30 Overall
Unmitigated Impact Evaluation for
Evaluation
Criteria |
Advanced Works |
Habitat Quality |
Low to
Moderate. |
Species of Conservation
Interest |
None recorded during the
surveys. Other wildlife species of conservation interest that may use the
areas are presented in Table 7.21. The impacts are expected to be low
due to the abundance of similar habitat in the surrounding area. |
Size/Abundance |
Permanent loss of approximately 0.03 ha of plantation
of a total 3.1 ha within the whole |
Duration |
The impact will
persist during the construction and operational phases. |
Reversibility |
|
Magnitude |
The scale of the
habitat loss and impact is low – it constitutes approximately 1% of this
habitat type within the whole Study Area.
|
Overall
Unmitigated Impact Conclusion |
Low |
Impacts to Wildlife in particular Species
of Conservation Interest
Despite some permanent habitat loss due to the
Project, relatively this loss is small compared to the quantity of similar
habitats or other suitable types of habitats in the immediate vicinity. In addition, the conduction works will be
temporary and relatively small scale.
Given the high mobility of the majority of the wildlife recorded (birds
and some mammals such as bats) and the ability of the less mobile wildlife such
as butterflies, odonates and herpetofauna to still relocate to nearby similar
habitats, the overall impacts to wildlife are likely to be minimal.
Overall twelve bird species and one butterfly species
of conservation interest were recorded in or flying above the Project Site during
the surveys; Common Buzzard, Greater Coucal, Black Kite, Peregrine Falcon, Chinese Pond Heron, Black-crowned Night Heron, Grey Heron, Great Egret,
Intermediate Egret, Little Egret, Common Teal, White-breasted Waterhen
and Coutesan
butterfly. Common Buzzard, Greater Coucal, Black Kite
and Peregrine Falcon are Class 2 Protected Animals of the PRC and except the
Greater Coucal are protected
under Cap 586 in
Although a
possible breeding site for Greater Painted Snipe was recorded within the Study
Area, it falls outside of the Project Site (at least 200m away) and no adverse
impact to this site or its associated wildlife is anticipated.
Eurasian Otter (protected under Cap 586, listed in CITES
Appendix 1 and Class 2 Protected Animals of the PRC) is a protected species and
considered as species of conservation interest with restricted records in Mai
Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site and nearby wetland areas ([52]). However, within the Study Area and Project
Site, no ecologically sensitive wetlands of high habitat quality as well as
Eurasian Otter were recorded during the surveys. Potential impacts to this habitat type and
this species are therefore not anticipated.
Overall, there will be no significant loss of feeding
grounds or change in ecological carrying capacity of the area and no reduction
in species abundance/ diversity is anticipated.
Other Impacts
As assessed in Section
7.10.2, given the temporary nature, relatively small-scale and phase
implementation of the construction works, as well as the provision of
cofferdam/diversion dyke and good construction site practices, other identified
potential impacts, such as habitat fragmentation and isolation, changes to
water quality and hydrology and other impacts due to noise, dust and human
disturbance were expected to be low impact and therefore are evaluated as not
being significant (see also Section 6.7).
Operation Phase
Assessment of potential impacts during the operation phase, such as
maintenance dredging at the flood retardation pond, change in hydrology and
noise and other disturbances generated by the operation activities were
assessed to be low impact and therefore are evaluated as not being significant.
Annex 16 of the EIAO-TM states that the general policy for mitigation of
significant ecological impacts, in order of priority, is:
Avoidance: Potential
impacts should be avoided to the maximum extent practicable by adopting suitable
alternatives;
Minimisation: Unavoidable
impacts should be minimised by taking appropriate and practicable measures such
as constraints on intensity of works operations or timing of works operations;
and
Compensation: The loss of important
species and habitats may be provided for elsewhere as compensation. Enhancement and other conservation measures
should always be considered whenever possible.
An options evaluation exercise was conducted to identify a technically
feasible, cost-effective, environmentally and socially acceptable option for
the Stage 4 regulation works. The
hydraulics model MIKE 11, developed by the Danish Hydraulics Institute (DHI),
was used to assess the effects of different design options on the hydrology and
hydraulics of the
This option maintains the existing alignment of the concerned section
of the
Potential ecological impacts associated with the
Project during the construction phase are the disturbance of mainly low quality
habitats (Developed Area, Low-lying Grassland,
Approximately 0.4 ha of the secondary woodland which
was located within the works area may be disturbed during the construction
phase, but such loss is considered as the worst case scenario for the purpose
of the assessment and the Project will preserve/avoid such habitat as far as
possible. If this small patch of
woodland could not be avoided due to the project works, it will be reinstated
after construction.
Approximately 1.9 ha of the
In order to minimise the impacts associated with the
habitat loss, approximately 1.6 ha of the stream/river habitat and
approximately 1.9 ha of the marshy low-lying grassland will be reinstated
respectively after the construction works.
Moreover, additional secondary woodland habitat (~0.5 ha) and
stream/river habitat with natural bottom (~2.1 ha) will be formed after the
advanced works and river modification works (see also Section 7.11.3).
As discussed in Section
7.10, the potential ecological impact caused by the Project is anticipated
to be low to moderate and the suggested mitigation measure would further reduce
the possible ecological impacts:
Implementation of good construction practices as
follows:
·
Avoid potential impacts on the trees/ secondary woodland habitat whenever possible during the detailed design stage. Where possible, the retained trees/ woodland
will be fenced off as protection from the construction works. If the trees cannot
be avoided due to the engineering constraint, the affected individual(s) will
be transplanted to compensatory woodland planting site near Pak Fu Shan (Figure
7.9) or a similar habitat in the
vicinity of the Project Site if considered suitable (subject to the detailed
assessment of the feasibility of transplantation). A detailed vegetation survey on the trees within
the impacted area would be conducted by a suitably qualified botanist/
ecologist to identify and record the affected individuals prior to the
commencement of site clearance works.
Feasibility and suitability of transplanting the affected plant species
of conservation interest would be carefully studied and suitable receptor sites
would be identified during Tree Felling Application;
·
Avoid
any damage and disturbance, particularly those caused by filling and illegal dumping,
to the surrounding habitats through proper management of waste disposal
(details refer to Section 9.6.2);
·
Arrange
river excavation works to be conducted in dry season (November to March) in order
to minimize the potential water quality impacts on downstream areas of high
ecological value. Impacts due to the
excavation works on the habitat and associated wildlife during dry season can
be minimised through phase implementation of works and adoption of good site
practices (see also Section 6.8.1);
·
Regularly
check the Site boundaries to ensure that they are not breached and that no
damage occurs to surrounding areas;
·
Regularly
check the performance and/ or effectiveness of the cofferdam and “diversion
dyke” in order to minimise surface runoff and the chance of soil erosion (see
also Section 6.8.1);
·
Prohibit
and prevent open burning within the site boundary during construction and
provide temporary fire fighting equipment in the work areas; and
·
Reinstate
temporary work sites/disturbed areas (including approximately 1.6 ha of the
7.11.3
Compensation
Since approximately 0.4 ha of
secondary woodland will be disturbed and 0.03 ha of plantation habitat will be
lost as a result of the Project’s advanced construction works, approximately
0.5 ha of compensatory woodland planting (in addition to the reinstatement of
the 0.4 ha secondary woodland if unavoidably affected) will be provided within
the Project Site near Pak Fu Shan (Figure
7.9). The proposed compensatory
woodland planting site will locate adjoining to the reinstated and existing
(undisturbed by the Project) secondary woodland. The compensatory woodland planting will
provide ecological linkage to the existing secondary woodland therefore
avoided/ minimised habitat fragmentation.
The selection of planting species shall be made with reference to the
species identified in the Tree Survey and
be native to Hong Kong or the South
Approximately 4.0 ha of stream/river habitat and 4.1
ha of riverbank landscape areas (locations refer to Figure 7.10) will be formed after the advanced works
and river modification works. The river
bed will be retained as natural bottom while the stream bank will be modified
by adopting a sloping landscape where suitable native riparian vegetation will
be planted to resemble the naturalness of the river. The design of reprovisioned stream/river
habitat is presented in Section 3.2.1.
Proper ecological design will be adopted for the
landscape works along the river banks, including the floodplains (the 1.9ha
marshy low-lying grassland will be reinstated in the floodplains at
·
Riverbank landscaping planting works will be carried out after the completion
of the embankment construction and slope protection works. The landscape characters along the river
course will be designed in view of mitigating any potential environmental or
landscape impacts, and taking into consideration the local characteristics and
the landuse planning in the adjacent area.
The works will be carried out under the supervision of qualified
landscape professionals.
·
The
overall objectives for the landscaping works will be mainly concerned with
ecological enhancement but also include landscape enhancement. Further details will be developed during
Detailed Design Stage. The river bank
will be designed in order to:
o
re-establish
the natural riparian ecosystem and enhance local biodiversity;
o
provide
similar habitat for marshy low-lying grassland;
o
protect
the water resources; and
o
avoid
erosion.
·
The arrangement of the planting, ie tree/ shrub/ grass
mix, will be subject to detailed landscape design and in line with the
landscape planting in Shenzhen side. Vegetation chosen for the landscaping
works will be based on the following:
o
Well
adapted to the environment – mainly use native species supplement by suitable
exotic plants;
o
Able
to contribute to enhancing the local biodiversity (mixed vegetations of trees, groundcovers
and grasses will be placed along the river bank); and
o
Low
management requirements - those species with low management requirements will
be chosen to minimize the maintenance cost; and
o
Prevent
obstruction of sight view - design should fulfil the security requirements for
boundary patrolling and therefore should not obstruct the sight view along the
boundary patrol road.
7.11.4
Additional Ecological Measure
With the implementation of the above mitigation
measures, no
adverse residual impacts due to the construction and operation of the Project are expected.
The following additional ecological measure will provide added
ecological value for the Project:
In addition to the
recommended mitigation measures listed in Sections
7.11.1-7.11.3, proper
ecological design will be adopted for the flood retardation pond (at
Shenzhen side). A flood retardation pond will be
constructed at chainage 14+778 to 15+183 within the Shenzhen boundary of the
Project Site to further enhance the ecological function of the area, which can serve as a wetland habitat for flora and
fauna. It will
have a total area of approximately 2.2 ha and a water depth of usually not more
than 1.2m. Two weirs with penstocks will
the used to control water level during the dry season. Areas of water depth of 0.3-0.8m will have ‘emergent plant’ such as
native Phragmites australis and
exotic Lepironia articulata planted
in it. Areas of water depth of 0.8-1.2m
will have ‘submerged and floating plants’ such as the native Vallisneria natans, Euryale ferox andTrapa
spp. planted. Further details will be
developed during Detailed Design Stage.
The current Project is scheduled to start advanced works
in February 2012, have a preparation phase between March and July 2013 followed
by a construction period of 44 months starting in August 2013 and ending in
March 2017.
Three further projects, including Liantang / Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Crossing
Point (LT/HYW BCP) and the Associated Works, Construction of the Secondary Boundary Fence and new Sections of
Primary Boundary Fence and
The LT/HYW BCP
and the Associated Works falls
directly in the current Project Study area and some cumulative habitat loss is
anticipated. Only habitats of low ecological
value including shrubland, plantation, active and abandoned agricultural lands,
drainage channel and developed area will be affected in Works Area of Section 1
(BCP), which is located within/ adjacent to the Project areas. Although permanent loss of some area of
woodland will be expected due to the tunnel portals and connecting roads in
other sections of the LT/HYW BCP and the Associated Works, the impacts
will be mitigated after woodland instatement and compensation. Given that there are extensive similar
habitats available for the wildlife in particular species of conservation
interest and with the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, no
unacceptable ecological impacts due to the construction and operation of the LT/HYW BCP and the Associated Works will expect to be anticipated. And therefore no significant cumulative
impacts are anticipated with the current Project.
For the Construction
of the Secondary Boundary Fence and new Sections of Primary Boundary Fence and
Patrol Road project, the reprovisioning of the boundary patrol road and
boundary fences along the concerned section of Shenzhen River under the Stage 4
regulation has already been incorporated into the design and construction
programme of this Project.
The Drainage
Improvement in
The feasibility study "Land Use Planning for the Closed Area" was conducted by the
Planning Department for the future planning use of the areas to be released
from the Closed Area. The project
encompasses the northern
Detailed assessment of the cumulative impacts cannot
be carried out for the NDA planned under the New Development Areas (NDA) in North East New Territories project
in Ping Che since there is no confirmed development schedule and programme
available for assessment. However, as
advised by the project proponent of the
NENT NDAs Study, the earliest construction works in Ping Che/Ta Kwu Ling (PC/TKL)
NDA is unlikely to commence before 2017.
As such, it is anticipated that no works in PC/TKL NDA would be
conducted concurrently with the works under this Project. Nonetheless, the nearest NDA to the Project Site is located at more than
600m from Shenzhen River and assuming this project has its own mitigation
measures and no unacceptable ecological residual impacts, no unacceptable
cumulative ecological impacts are anticipated with the current Project.
7.13
Residual Environmental Impacts
No adverse residual impact due to the construction and
operation of the Project is expected after the
implementation of the proposed mitigation measures proposed in Section 7.11. The proposed mitigation measures included
reinstatement of ~0.4 ha secondary woodland, ~1.6 ha of Shenzhen River and ~1.9
ha of marshy low-lying grassland, provision of approximately 0.5 ha of
compensatory woodland planting for the loss of ~0.03 ha plantation, ~2.4 ha
stream/river habitat for the loss of ~0.3 ha of Shenzhen River and ~0.65 ha of channel
and approximately 4.1 ha of riverbank landscaping areas for the loss of ~4 ha
marshy low-lying grassland. For the loss
of other habitats including plantation, abandoned agricultural land, cultivated
land (dry), wet active agricultural land, low-lying grassland and developed
area, no significant residual ecological impacts is anticipated under the
project.
7.14
Environmental Monitoring and Audit
7.14.1
Construction Phase
No ecological mitigation measures apart from the adoption
of good construction practise is required to be checked as part of the
environmental monitoring and audit procedures during the construction
phase.
The completed landscape works (including compensatory
planting and riverbanks landscape plantings on Hong Kong side) adopting
ecological design at the
7.14.2
Operation Phase
Although no adverse residual impacts are envisaged based
on the results of impact assessment, wetland dependent bird monitoring for one
year after the establishment of the landscape plantings in the
reprovisioned/reinstated habitats. The
purpose of the operation monitoring is to review the performance of the
reprovisioned/reinstated habitats.
Particular focus will be made on bird species of conservation interest
(especially ardeid species including Chinese Pond Heron, Black-crowned Night
Heron, Grey Heron, Great Egret, Intermediate Egret and Little Egret, and two
wetland dependant species Common Teal and White-breasted Waterhen).
Standard, quantitative point count surveys will be
undertaken at designated sampling locations at once per month after the
establishment of the landscape plantings of the Project. The necessity for further ecological
monitoring would be reviewed after the first year ecological monitoring
programme. Locations of sampling
transects shall include reprovisioned/reinstated habitats including riverbank
landscape areas, floodplains and watercourse, and other reference locations
within
The ecological impact assessment has been prepared
using the results of a literature review and ecological field update surveys
conducted between the end of 2009 and early 2010, covering wet and dry
seasons. While data was collected for
the whole Study Area (Shenzhen side and Hong Kong side), results and impact
evaluation has focused, in this Report, on the
The ecological resources recorded within the Study
Area included twelve habitats (woodland [including fung shui woodland],
plantation, shrubby grassland, low-lying grassland, marshy low-lying grassland,
abandoned agricultural land, cultivated land (dry), wet active agricultural
land, stream / river, channel, pond and developed area) of which only two were
not found in the Project Site (shrubby grassland and pond). Low-lying grassland, wet active agricultural
land, cultivated land (dry), channel, pond and developed area (including road /
path) were considered as having low ecological value, secondary woodland and
the stream / river other than the Shenzhen River as having moderate ecological
value, fung shui woodland as having high ecological value and the remainder
(plantation, shrubby grassland, abandoned agricultural land marshy low-lying
grassland and Shenzhen River) as having low to moderate ecological value. One small section of the Ping Yuen channel,
located outside the Project Site, was considered of low to moderate ecological
value, due to it acting as a possible breeding site for Greater Painted
Snipe. Overall 286 plant species were
recorded in the Study Area, only one of which was a species of conservation
interest (Incense Tree), which was recorded in the secondary woodland habitat
to the south of the Tsung Yuen Ha within the Study Area. No plant species of conservation interest was
recorded within the Project Site.
A total of 38 wildlife species of conservation interest
were recorded within the Study Area , including six mammal species (Small
Indian Civet, East Asian / Malayan Porcupine, Leopard Cat and three
unidentified bat species), 26 bird species (Crested
Serpent Eagle, Besra, Black Kite, Common Buzzard, Peregrine Falcon, Greater
Spotted Eagle, Bonelli's Eagle, Savanna Nightjar, Emerald Dove, Greater Coucal, Lesser Coucal,
Asian Barred Owlet / Cuckoo Owl, Japanese
Sparrowhawk, Crested Goshawk and Greater Painted Snipe, Chinese Pond Heron,
Black-crowned Night Heron, Grey Heron, Great Egret, Intermediate Egret, Little
Egret, Cattle Egret, Little Green Heron, Common Teal, White-breasted Waterhen
and Yellow-breasted Bunting), two herpetofauna species (Chinese
Bullfrog and Burmese Python), three butterfly
species (Courtesan, Small
Three-ring and Spotted Angle) and one dragonfly
species, (Tawny Hooktail). Only 13 of these species were recorded in the Project
Site during the surveys, 12 of them being highly mobile birds (Greater Coucal,
Common Buzzard, Peregrine Falcon, Black Kite, Chinese Pond Heron,
Black-crowned Night Heron, Grey Heron, Great Egret, Intermediate Egret, Little
Egret, Common Teal and White-breasted Waterhen) and the other being the Courtesan butterfly which
despite not being as mobile, has an abundance of similar habitat in the
immediate vicinity.
The Project Site is split
into two components, the advanced works area and the river modification &
associated works and will cause some permanent habitat loss. The
A bird monitoring programme will be undertaken to
monitor the effectiveness of the reprovisioned/reinstated habitats during the
operation of the Project. Monitoring of
bird abundance and occurrence will be undertaken for one year after the
establishment of the landscape plantings of the Project.